CGUS vs UTF
Capital Group Core Equity ETF vs Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund Inc
Which is better, CGUS or UTF?
CGUS has been ahead.
CGUS has a lower expense ratio. CGUS led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGUS | UTF |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.33%Best | 3.42% |
| AUM | $12.3B | $3.0B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.83% | 7.58% |
| Holdings | 75 | 311 |
| YTD Return | +11.95%Best | +10.17% |
| 1Y Return | +15.39%Best | +14.56% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.76%Best | +17.54% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +5.94% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.7%Best | 19.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -21.9%Best | -30.3% |
| $10,000 over 4.6 years | $19,073Best | $14,031 |
| Fund Family | Capital Group (US) | Cohen & Steers Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 22, 2022 | Mar 30, 2004 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 24, 2022 to Oct 14, 2026 (4.6 years).
CGUS vs UTF growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.6 years both funds cover.
CGUS vs UTF Performance
Capital Group Core Equity ETF (CGUS) is an ETF from Capital Group (US) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund Inc (UTF) is an ETF from Cohen & Steers Funds. Over the past year CGUS returned +15.39% while UTF returned +14.56%. Year to date, CGUS is up 11.95% versus a gain of 10.17% for UTF.
Over three years, CGUS compounded at +21.76% per year against +17.54% for UTF.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
UTF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.3% compared with 14.7% for CGUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.9% for CGUS and -30.3% for UTF. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CGUS charges 0.33% per year while UTF charges 3.42%. On a $10,000 position that is $33 vs $342 annually, a gap of $309 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGUS currently yields 0.83% against 7.58% for UTF.
Holdings Overlap
At least 2.3% of CGUS's money is in holdings UTF also owns.
Stated as a floor: for UTF, our book for it covers 93.7% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
CGUS and UTF share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 95 days apart, CGUS as of Oct 3, 2026 and UTF as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
4 positions in common, counted across the 68 positions we hold weights for in CGUS and 252 in UTF, against full books of 75 and 311.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CGUS and UTF you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CGUS or UTF?
CGUS has an expense ratio of 0.33% while UTF charges 3.42%. CGUS is the cheaper option, by $309 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CGUS or UTF?
Over the past year CGUS returned +15.39% vs +14.56% for UTF, so CGUS leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CGUS or UTF?
UTF has been the more volatile fund at 19.3% annualized versus 14.7% for CGUS. Worst drawdown: CGUS -21.9% vs UTF -30.3%.
Should I hold both CGUS and UTF?
CGUS and UTF have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between CGUS and UTF?
At least 2.3% of CGUS's money is in holdings UTF also owns. Our book for UTF is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 4 positions in common, counted across the 68 positions we hold weights for in CGUS and 252 in UTF.
Which pays a higher dividend, CGUS or UTF?
CGUS yields 0.83% while UTF yields 7.58%, so UTF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is UTF better than CGUS?
CGUS has a lower expense ratio. CGUS led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.