CGVV vs VTI
Capital Group US Large Value ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, CGVV or VTI?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. CGVV led over 1Y, VTI over the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGVV | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.33% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $150M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.85% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 130 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +15.35%Best | +13.02% |
| 1Y Return | +20.64%Best | +16.63% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.97% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.99% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.7% | 11.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -10.1% | -8.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.3 years | $12,409 | $12,697Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 38.8% | 33.5%Best |
| Fund Family | Capital Group (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 24, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 26, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.3 years).
CGVV vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.3 years both funds cover.
CGVV vs VTI Performance
Capital Group US Large Value ETF (CGVV) is an ETF from Capital Group (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CGVV returned +20.64% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, CGVV is up 15.35% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CGVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.7% compared with 11.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.1% for CGVV and -8.9% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CGVV charges 0.33% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $33 vs $3 annually, a gap of $30 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGVV currently yields 0.85% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
95.3% of CGVV's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 30.3% of VTI's money is in holdings CGVV also owns.
Most of CGVV is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
61 positions in common, counted across the 65 positions we hold weights for in CGVV and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 130 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,094 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for CGVV (67.3% of the fund), and 1 for CGVV that do not appear in VTI (1.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CGVV | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.61% | 5.11% | 1.50% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 7.27% | 3.41% | 3.86% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 1.59% | 6.30% | 4.71% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 4.93% | 1.70% | 3.23% |
| INTCIntel Corporation | 4.77% | 0.51% | 4.26% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 0.94% | 2.70% | 1.76% |
| UBERUber Technologies Inc | 3.24% | 0.21% | 3.03% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 2.05% | 1.29% | 0.76% |
| BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc Brk/B Us Equity | 1.95% | 1.23% | 0.72% |
| SBUXStarbucks Corp | 2.94% | 0.16% | 2.78% |
95.3% of CGVV is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CGVV or VTI?
CGVV has an expense ratio of 0.33% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $30 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CGVV or VTI?
Over the past year CGVV returned +20.64% vs +16.63% for VTI, so CGVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), CGVV annualized +18.06% vs +20.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CGVV or VTI?
CGVV has been the more volatile fund at 13.7% annualized versus 11.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: CGVV -10.1% vs VTI -8.9%.
Should I hold both CGVV and VTI?
CGVV and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between CGVV and VTI?
95.3% of CGVV's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 30.3% of VTI's is in holdings CGVV also owns. They hold 61 positions in common, counted across the 65 positions we hold weights for in CGVV and 3,441 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, CGVV or VTI?
CGVV yields 0.85% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than CGVV?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. CGVV led over 1Y, VTI over the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.