CHGX vs FTCS
Stance Sustainable Beta ETF vs First Trust Capital Strength ETF
Which is better, CHGX or FTCS?
Each has led over a different period.
CHGX has a lower expense ratio. CHGX led over 1Y, FTCS over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. CHGX is less concentrated, with 11.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 22.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CHGX | FTCS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49%Best | 0.52% |
| AUM | $179M | $7.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.55% | 1.22% |
| Holdings | 203 | 102 |
| YTD Return | +21.11%Best | +6.41% |
| 1Y Return | +20.36%Best | +5.59% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.83% | +10.51%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.53% | +6.06%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.4% | 14.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -47.3% | -31.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $10,268 | $13,420Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 11.8%Best | 22.5% |
| Fund Family | STANCE Capital | First Trust Portfolios (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 14, 2024 | Jul 6, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 10, 2017 to Oct 14, 2026 (9 years).
CHGX vs FTCS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 9 years both funds cover.
CHGX vs FTCS Performance
Stance Sustainable Beta ETF (CHGX) is an ETF from STANCE Capital and First Trust Capital Strength ETF (FTCS) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year CHGX returned +20.36% while FTCS returned +5.59%. Year to date, CHGX is up 21.11% versus a gain of 6.41% for FTCS.
Over three years, CHGX compounded at +3.83% per year against +10.51% for FTCS; over five years the annualized figures are +0.53% and +6.06% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, FTCS has the edge at +9.05% annualized vs +7.81%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CHGX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.4% compared with 14.7% for FTCS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -47.3% for CHGX and -31.9% for FTCS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CHGX charges 0.49% per year while FTCS charges 0.52%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $52 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CHGX currently yields 0.55% against 1.22% for FTCS.
Holdings Overlap
13.5% of CHGX's money is in holdings FTCS also owns. 28.5% of FTCS's money is in holdings CHGX also owns.
FTCS and CHGX share little of their money.
14 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in CHGX and 50 in FTCS, against full books of 203 and 102.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 36 positions for FTCS that do not appear in our book for CHGX (71.3% of the fund), and 87 for CHGX that do not appear in FTCS (86.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CHGX | Weight in FTCS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMGNAmgen Inc | 1.04% | 2.27% | 1.23% |
| MRKMerck & Co. Inc. | 0.97% | 2.34% | 1.37% |
| GILDGilead Sciences Inc | 1.00% | 2.23% | 1.23% |
| CMECme Group, Inc | 0.95% | 2.22% | 1.27% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 0.99% | 2.07% | 1.08% |
| ADPAutomatic Data Processing | 0.97% | 2.09% | 1.12% |
| MAMastercard Inc. Cl A | 0.95% | 2.10% | 1.15% |
| ROSTRoss Stores Inc | 1.02% | 2.02% | 1.00% |
| VVisa Inc. Cl A | 0.96% | 2.08% | 1.12% |
| SCHWSchwab (Charles) Corp | 0.90% | 1.97% | 1.07% |
28.5% of FTCS is already inside CHGX.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CHGX or FTCS?
CHGX has an expense ratio of 0.49% while FTCS charges 0.52%. CHGX is the cheaper option, by $3 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CHGX or FTCS?
Over the past year CHGX returned +20.36% vs +5.59% for FTCS, so CHGX leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), CHGX annualized +7.81% vs +9.05% for FTCS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CHGX or FTCS?
CHGX has been the more volatile fund at 21.4% annualized versus 14.7% for FTCS. Worst drawdown: CHGX -47.3% vs FTCS -31.9%.
Should I hold both CHGX and FTCS?
CHGX and FTCS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between CHGX and FTCS?
28.5% of FTCS's money is in holdings CHGX also owns. 28.5% of FTCS's is in holdings CHGX also owns. They hold 14 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in CHGX and 50 in FTCS.
Which pays a higher dividend, CHGX or FTCS?
CHGX yields 0.55% while FTCS yields 1.22%, so FTCS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is FTCS better than CHGX?
CHGX has a lower expense ratio. CHGX led over 1Y, FTCS over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. CHGX is less concentrated, with 11.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 22.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.