CLSX vs QQQ
Tradr 2X Long CLSK Daily ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, CLSX or QQQ?
Trading-Leveraged Equity against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CLSX | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.46% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $16M | $506.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.42% |
| Holdings | 6 | 321 |
| YTD Return | -70.47% | +19.30%Best |
| 1Y Return | -94.05% | +22.47%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +26.18% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.42% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 190.0% | 21.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -94.6% | -12.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.1 years | $2,001 | $12,463Best |
| Fund Family | Tradr ETFs | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Leveraged Equity | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Sep 15, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 16, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.1 years).
CLSX vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.1 years both funds cover.
CLSX vs QQQ Performance
Tradr 2X Long CLSK Daily ETF (CLSX) is an ETF from Tradr ETFs and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year CLSX returned -94.05% while QQQ returned +22.47%. Year to date, CLSX is down 70.47% versus a gain of 19.30% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CLSX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 190.0% compared with 21.2% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -94.6% for CLSX and -12.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CLSX charges 1.46% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $146 vs $18 annually, a gap of $128 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CLSX currently yields 0.00% against 0.42% for QQQ.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CLSX and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CLSX or QQQ?
CLSX has an expense ratio of 1.46% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $128 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CLSX or QQQ?
Over the past year CLSX returned -94.05% vs +22.47% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), CLSX annualized -76.84% vs +22.16% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CLSX or QQQ?
CLSX has been the more volatile fund at 190.0% annualized versus 21.2% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: CLSX -94.6% vs QQQ -12.0%.
Should I hold both CLSX and QQQ?
CLSX and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, CLSX or QQQ?
CLSX yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than CLSX?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.