CNCR vs RMT
Range Cancer Therapeutics ETF vs Royce Micro-Cap Trust Inc.
Which is better, CNCR or RMT?
RMT has been ahead.
CNCR has a lower expense ratio. RMT led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CNCR | RMT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79%Best | 1.35% |
| AUM | $7M | $830M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 5.71% |
| Holdings | 67 | 171 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 31.6% | 23.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -75.8% | -57.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 9.6 years | $3,985 | $15,814Best |
| Fund Family | Loncar Investments | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Blend | Small Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 13, 2015 | Dec 14, 1993 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 506 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. CNCR has data through May 27, 2025 and RMT through Oct 15, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 9.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 14, 2015 to May 27, 2025 (9.6 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CNCR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 31.6% compared with 23.6% for RMT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -75.8% for CNCR and -57.3% for RMT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.59. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CNCR charges 0.79% per year while RMT charges 1.35%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $135 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CNCR currently yields 0.00% against 5.71% for RMT.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CNCR and RMT you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CNCR or RMT?
CNCR has an expense ratio of 0.79% while RMT charges 1.35%. CNCR is the cheaper option, by $56 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, CNCR or RMT?
CNCR has been the more volatile fund at 31.6% annualized versus 23.6% for RMT. Worst drawdown: CNCR -75.8% vs RMT -57.3%.
Should I hold both CNCR and RMT?
CNCR and RMT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.59, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, CNCR or RMT?
CNCR yields 0.00% while RMT yields 5.71%, so RMT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RMT better than CNCR?
CNCR has a lower expense ratio. RMT led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.