CNXT vs FRWD
VanEck ChiNext ETF vs Nomura Transformational Technologies ETF
Which is better, CNXT or FRWD?
CNXT and FRWD are close on what we can measure.
CNXT is less concentrated, with 54.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 56.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CNXT | FRWD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65%Tie | 0.65%Tie |
| AUM | $83M | $274M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.18% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 196 | 54 |
| YTD Return | -9.60% | +24.83%Best |
| 1Y Return | +1.51% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.72% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -2.73% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 54.4%Best | 56.0% |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Nomura Asset Management Co Ltd |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jul 23, 2014 | Jan 13, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
CNXT vs FRWD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
CNXT vs FRWD Performance
VanEck ChiNext ETF (CNXT) is an ETF from VanEck and Nomura Transformational Technologies ETF (FRWD) is an ETF from Nomura Asset Management Co Ltd. Year to date, CNXT is down 9.60% versus a gain of 24.83% for FRWD.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CNXT charges 0.65% per year while FRWD charges 0.65%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $65 annually. On income, CNXT currently yields 0.18% against 0.00% for FRWD.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 97 holdings in CNXT and 26 in FRWD, totalling 99.7% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 97 positions we hold weights for in CNXT and 26 in FRWD, against full books of 196 and 54.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 19 positions for FRWD that do not appear in our book for CNXT (70.4% of the fund), and 0 for CNXT that do not appear in FRWD (0.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CNXT and FRWD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CNXT or FRWD?
CNXT has an expense ratio of 0.65% while FRWD charges 0.65%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which pays a higher dividend, CNXT or FRWD?
CNXT yields 0.18% while FRWD yields 0.00%, so CNXT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is FRWD better than CNXT?
CNXT is less concentrated, with 54.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 56.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.