COMB vs FTGC
GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF vs First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund
Which is better, COMB or FTGC?
Nearly the same fund. COMB costs less.
COMB has a lower expense ratio. FTGC led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | COMB | FTGC |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.25%Best | 0.98% |
| AUM | $163M | $3.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 6.85% | 14.28% |
| Holdings | 28 | 40 |
| YTD Return | +34.41% | +37.58%Best |
| 1Y Return | +41.39% | +43.36%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.75% | +18.07%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.20% | +13.46%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.6% | 13.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -33.5%Best | -36.9% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,252 | $18,802Best |
| Fund Family | GraniteShares | First Trust Portfolios (US) |
| Category | Commodity | Commodity |
| Style | Commodities | Commodities |
| Inception | May 19, 2017 | Oct 21, 2013 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 24, 2017 to Oct 14, 2026 (9.4 years).
COMB vs FTGC growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 9.4 years both funds cover.
COMB vs FTGC Performance
GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB) is an ETF from GraniteShares and First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year COMB returned +41.39% while FTGC returned +43.36%. Year to date, COMB is up 34.41% versus a gain of 37.58% for FTGC.
Over three years, COMB compounded at +15.75% per year against +18.07% for FTGC; over five years the annualized figures are +10.20% and +13.46% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, FTGC has the edge at +9.59% annualized vs +8.18%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
COMB has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 13.9% for FTGC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.5% for COMB and -36.9% for FTGC. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
COMB charges 0.25% per year while FTGC charges 0.98%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $98 annually, a gap of $73 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, COMB currently yields 6.85% against 14.28% for FTGC.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of COMB and FTGC you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, COMB or FTGC?
COMB has an expense ratio of 0.25% while FTGC charges 0.98%. COMB is the cheaper option, by $73 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, COMB or FTGC?
Over the past year COMB returned +41.39% vs +43.36% for FTGC, so FTGC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), COMB annualized +8.18% vs +9.59% for FTGC. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, COMB or FTGC?
COMB has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 13.9% for FTGC. Worst drawdown: COMB -33.5% vs FTGC -36.9%.
Should I hold both COMB and FTGC?
COMB and FTGC have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, COMB or FTGC?
COMB yields 6.85% while FTGC yields 14.28%, so FTGC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is FTGC better than COMB?
COMB has a lower expense ratio. FTGC led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.