CONL vs NFLU
GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF vs T-Rex 2X Long NFLX Daily Target ETF
Which is better, CONL or NFLU?
NFLU has been ahead.
CONL has a lower expense ratio. NFLU led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CONL | NFLU |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.04%Best | 1.05% |
| AUM | $600M | $27M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.02% |
| Holdings | 2 | 5 |
| YTD Return | -69.46% | -51.23%Best |
| 1Y Return | -86.98% | -74.20%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -21.64% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 151.9% | 71.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -94.5% | -81.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 2 years | $1,765 | $6,104Best |
| Fund Family | GraniteShares | REX Shares |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Trading-Leveraged Equity | Trading-Leveraged Equity |
| Inception | Aug 9, 2022 | Sep 27, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 27, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2 years).
CONL vs NFLU growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2 years both funds cover.
CONL vs NFLU Performance
GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF (CONL) is an ETF from GraniteShares and T-Rex 2X Long NFLX Daily Target ETF (NFLU) is an ETF from REX Shares. Over the past year CONL returned -86.98% while NFLU returned -74.20%. Year to date, CONL is down 69.46% versus a loss of 51.23% for NFLU.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CONL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 151.9% compared with 71.3% for NFLU. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -94.5% for CONL and -81.8% for NFLU. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.59. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CONL charges 1.04% per year while NFLU charges 1.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $104 vs $105 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CONL currently yields 0.00% against 0.02% for NFLU.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CONL and NFLU you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CONL or NFLU?
CONL has an expense ratio of 1.04% while NFLU charges 1.05%. CONL is the cheaper option, by $1 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CONL or NFLU?
Over the past year CONL returned -86.98% vs -74.20% for NFLU, so NFLU leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), CONL annualized -57.99% vs -21.87% for NFLU. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CONL or NFLU?
CONL has been the more volatile fund at 151.9% annualized versus 71.3% for NFLU. Worst drawdown: CONL -94.5% vs NFLU -81.8%.
Should I hold both CONL and NFLU?
CONL and NFLU have a monthly-return correlation of 0.59, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, CONL or NFLU?
CONL yields 0.00% while NFLU yields 0.02%, so NFLU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is NFLU better than CONL?
CONL has a lower expense ratio. NFLU led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.