CONY vs DISO
YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF vs YieldMax DIS Option Income Strategy ETF
Which is better, CONY or DISO?
Each has led over a different period.
CONY has a lower expense ratio. CONY led over the full window, DISO over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CONY | DISO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.04%Best | 1.32% |
| AUM | $381M | $4M |
| Dividend Yield | 119.91% | 43.83% |
| Holdings | 17 | 30 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 61.4% | 22.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -63.6% | -26.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.8 years | $13,407Best | $11,381 |
| Fund Family | YieldMax ETF | YieldMax ETF |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Aug 14, 2023 | Aug 24, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 121 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. CONY has data through Oct 14, 2026 and DISO through Jun 15, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 25, 2023 to Jun 15, 2026 (2.8 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CONY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 61.4% compared with 22.2% for DISO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -63.6% for CONY and -26.6% for DISO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.54. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CONY charges 1.04% per year while DISO charges 1.32%. On a $10,000 position that is $104 vs $132 annually, a gap of $28 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CONY currently yields 119.91% against 43.83% for DISO.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 2 holdings in CONY and 6 in DISO, totalling 27.7% and 92.6% of the two funds. Neither is a share of a fund we can divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 1 positions appear in both.
The two holdings books were reported 227 days apart, CONY as of Sep 15, 2026 and DISO as of Jan 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
1 positions in common, counted across the 2 positions we hold weights for in CONY and 6 in DISO, against full books of 17 and 30.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CONY | Weight in DISO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FGXXXFirst American Government Obligations Fund | 2.81% | 3.05% | 0.24% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CONY and DISO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CONY or DISO?
CONY has an expense ratio of 1.04% while DISO charges 1.32%. CONY is the cheaper option, by $28 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, CONY or DISO?
CONY has been the more volatile fund at 61.4% annualized versus 22.2% for DISO. Worst drawdown: CONY -63.6% vs DISO -26.6%.
Should I hold both CONY and DISO?
CONY and DISO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.54, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, CONY or DISO?
CONY yields 119.91% while DISO yields 43.83%, so CONY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is DISO better than CONY?
CONY has a lower expense ratio. CONY led over the full window, DISO over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.