CONY vs TJUL

CONY vs TJUL

Which is better, CONY or TJUL?

Each has led over a different period.

TJUL has a lower expense ratio. CONY led over 3Y and the full window, TJUL over 1Y.

Lower Fees: TJULHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricCONYTJUL
Expense Ratio1.04%0.79%Best
AUM$381M$115M
Dividend Yield119.91%0.00%
Holdings1715
YTD Return-21.83%+3.68%Best
1Y Return-42.68%+4.83%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+9.76%Best+7.68%
Volatility (annualized)60.7%3.4%Best
Max Drawdown-63.6%-4.6%Best
$10,000 over 3.2 years$13,425Best$12,477
Fund FamilyYieldMax ETFInnovator ETFs Trust
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleMulti AlternativeMulti Alternative
InceptionAug 14, 2023Jul 18, 2023

Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 15, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.2 years).

CONY vs TJUL growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.2 years both funds cover.

Compare CONY against instead:CONY vs SPYCONY vs QQQCONY vs VOOCONY vs VTITJUL against:TJUL vs VXUS

CONY vs TJUL Performance

YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY) is an ETF from YieldMax ETF and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr to July 2027 (TJUL) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year CONY returned -42.68% while TJUL returned +4.83%. Year to date, CONY is down 21.83% versus a gain of 3.68% for TJUL.

Over three years, CONY compounded at +9.76% per year against +7.68% for TJUL.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

CONY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 60.7% compared with 3.4% for TJUL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -63.6% for CONY and -4.6% for TJUL. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.47. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

CONY charges 1.04% per year while TJUL charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $104 vs $79 annually, a gap of $25 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CONY currently yields 119.91% against 0.00% for TJUL.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of CONY and TJUL you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

CONYTJUL

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, CONY or TJUL?

CONY has an expense ratio of 1.04% while TJUL charges 0.79%. TJUL is the cheaper option, by $25 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, CONY or TJUL?

Over the past year CONY returned -42.68% vs +4.83% for TJUL, so TJUL leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, CONY or TJUL?

CONY has been the more volatile fund at 60.7% annualized versus 3.4% for TJUL. Worst drawdown: CONY -63.6% vs TJUL -4.6%.

Should I hold both CONY and TJUL?

CONY and TJUL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.47, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, CONY or TJUL?

CONY yields 119.91% while TJUL yields 0.00%, so CONY currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is TJUL better than CONY?

TJUL has a lower expense ratio. CONY led over 3Y and the full window, TJUL over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.