CORB vs JHCB
AB Core Bond ETF vs John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF
Which is better, CORB or JHCB?
CORB has been ahead.
CORB has a lower expense ratio. CORB led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CORB | JHCB |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.28%Best | 0.29% |
| AUM | $1.2B | $99M |
| Dividend Yield | 3.56% | 5.42% |
| Holdings | 727 | 181 |
| YTD Return | -3.08%Best | -3.09% |
| 1Y Return | -2.96%Best | -3.15% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +5.71% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | -0.34% |
| Fund Family | AllianceBernstein L.P. | John Hancock Investment Management |
| Category | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Inception | Nov 7, 2025 | Mar 30, 2021 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight, Style.
CORB vs JHCB growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
CORB vs JHCB Performance
AB Core Bond ETF (CORB) is an ETF from AllianceBernstein L.P. and John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF (JHCB) is an ETF from John Hancock Investment Management. Over the past year CORB returned -2.96% while JHCB returned -3.15%. Year to date, CORB is down 3.08% versus a loss of 3.09% for JHCB.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CORB charges 0.28% per year while JHCB charges 0.29%. On a $10,000 position that is $28 vs $29 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CORB currently yields 3.56% against 5.42% for JHCB.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 429 holdings in CORB and 161 in JHCB, totalling 81.7% and 89.1% of the two funds. Neither is a share of a fund we can divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 3 positions appear in both.
3 positions in common, counted across the 429 positions we hold weights for in CORB and 161 in JHCB, against full books of 727 and 181.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CORB | Weight in JHCB | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| GS V2.65 10/21/32Goldman Sachs Group Inc Regd V/R 2.65000000 | 0.01% | 0.35% | 0.34% |
| OKE 6.05 09/01/33Oneok Inc 6.05 09/01/2033 | 0.06% | 0.17% | 0.11% |
| LLOYDS V4.976 08/11/Lloyds Banking Group Plc 4.98 08/11/2033 | 0.04% | 0.18% | 0.14% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CORB and JHCB you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CORB or JHCB?
CORB has an expense ratio of 0.28% while JHCB charges 0.29%. CORB is the cheaper option, by $1 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CORB or JHCB?
Over the past year CORB returned -2.96% vs -3.15% for JHCB, so CORB leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, CORB or JHCB?
CORB yields 3.56% while JHCB yields 5.42%, so JHCB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is JHCB better than CORB?
CORB has a lower expense ratio. CORB led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.