CORB vs RFCI
AB Core Bond ETF vs ALPS Dynamic Core Income ETF
Which is better, CORB or RFCI?
RFCI has been ahead.
CORB has a lower expense ratio. RFCI led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CORB | RFCI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.28%Best | 0.51% |
| AUM | $1.2B | $13M |
| Dividend Yield | 3.56% | 4.76% |
| Holdings | 727 | 48 |
| YTD Return | -3.08% | -1.66%Best |
| 1Y Return | -2.96% | -1.45%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +4.92% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +1.12% |
| Fund Family | AllianceBernstein L.P. | ALPS Advisors |
| Category | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Inception | Nov 7, 2025 | Jun 13, 2016 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight, Style.
CORB vs RFCI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
CORB vs RFCI Performance
AB Core Bond ETF (CORB) is an ETF from AllianceBernstein L.P. and ALPS Dynamic Core Income ETF (RFCI) is an ETF from ALPS Advisors. Over the past year CORB returned -2.96% while RFCI returned -1.45%. Year to date, CORB is down 3.08% versus a loss of 1.66% for RFCI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CORB charges 0.28% per year while RFCI charges 0.51%. On a $10,000 position that is $28 vs $51 annually, a gap of $23 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CORB currently yields 3.56% against 4.76% for RFCI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 429 holdings in CORB and 37 in RFCI, totalling 81.7% and 83.6% of the two funds. Neither is a share of a fund we can divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 5 positions appear in both.
5 positions in common, counted across the 429 positions we hold weights for in CORB and 37 in RFCI, against full books of 727 and 48.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CORB | Weight in RFCI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| T 4.75 11/15/43Us Treas Bds 4.75% 11/15/43 | 0.58% | 11.02% | 10.44% |
| T 4.375 05/15/34United States Treasury Note/Bondus Treasury N/B | 0.17% | 3.85% | 3.68% |
| T 4.75 02/15/37Us Treasury N/B 02/37 4.75 | 0.13% | 3.86% | 3.73% |
| T 3.625 05/15/53United States Treasury Note/Bo 3.6250% Mat 05/15/2053 | 0.26% | 2.40% | 2.14% |
| OKE 5.4 10/15/35Oneok Inc Company Guar 10/35 5.4 | 0.06% | 1.12% | 1.06% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CORB and RFCI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CORB or RFCI?
CORB has an expense ratio of 0.28% while RFCI charges 0.51%. CORB is the cheaper option, by $23 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CORB or RFCI?
Over the past year CORB returned -2.96% vs -1.45% for RFCI, so RFCI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, CORB or RFCI?
CORB yields 3.56% while RFCI yields 4.76%, so RFCI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RFCI better than CORB?
CORB has a lower expense ratio. RFCI led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.