CORB vs RSBT
AB Core Bond ETF vs Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF
Which is better, CORB or RSBT?
RSBT has been ahead.
CORB has a lower expense ratio. RSBT led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CORB | RSBT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.28%Best | 1.01% |
| AUM | $1.2B | $165M |
| Dividend Yield | 3.56% | 2.95% |
| Holdings | 727 | 34 |
| YTD Return | -3.08% | +8.40%Best |
| 1Y Return | -2.96% | +8.40%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +4.37% |
| Fund Family | AllianceBernstein L.P. | Return Stacked ETF |
| Category | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Inception | Nov 7, 2025 | Feb 7, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight, Style.
CORB vs RSBT growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
CORB vs RSBT Performance
AB Core Bond ETF (CORB) is an ETF from AllianceBernstein L.P. and Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT) is an ETF from Return Stacked ETF. Over the past year CORB returned -2.96% while RSBT returned +8.40%. Year to date, CORB is down 3.08% versus a gain of 8.40% for RSBT.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CORB charges 0.28% per year while RSBT charges 1.01%. On a $10,000 position that is $28 vs $101 annually, a gap of $73 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CORB currently yields 3.56% against 2.95% for RSBT.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 429 holdings in CORB and 2 in RSBT, totalling 81.7% and 90.7% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 429 positions we hold weights for in CORB and 2 in RSBT, against full books of 727 and 34.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CORB and RSBT you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CORB or RSBT?
CORB has an expense ratio of 0.28% while RSBT charges 1.01%. CORB is the cheaper option, by $73 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CORB or RSBT?
Over the past year CORB returned -2.96% vs +8.40% for RSBT, so RSBT leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, CORB or RSBT?
CORB yields 3.56% while RSBT yields 2.95%, so CORB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RSBT better than CORB?
CORB has a lower expense ratio. RSBT led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.