COSW vs QQQ
Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, COSW or QQQ?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | COSW | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.99% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $11M | $506.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 28.62% | 0.42% |
| Holdings | 15 | 321 |
| YTD Return | +1.90% | +19.30%Best |
| 1Y Return | -9.96% | +22.47%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +26.18% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.42% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.6% | 21.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Roundhill Investments | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Oct 23, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
COSW vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
COSW vs QQQ Performance
Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF (COSW) is an ETF from Roundhill Investments and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year COSW returned -9.96% while QQQ returned +22.47%. Year to date, COSW is up 1.90% versus a gain of 19.30% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
COSW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.6% compared with 21.9% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.23. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
COSW charges 0.99% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $99 vs $18 annually, a gap of $81 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, COSW currently yields 28.62% against 0.42% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 2 holdings in COSW and 101 in QQQ, totalling 13.3% and 99.6% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 2 positions we hold weights for in COSW and 101 in QQQ, against full books of 15 and 321.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of COSW and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, COSW or QQQ?
COSW has an expense ratio of 0.99% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $81 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, COSW or QQQ?
Over the past year COSW returned -9.96% vs +22.47% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, COSW or QQQ?
COSW has been the more volatile fund at 22.6% annualized versus 21.9% for QQQ.
Should I hold both COSW and QQQ?
COSW and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of -0.23, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, COSW or QQQ?
COSW yields 28.62% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so COSW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than COSW?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.