COWG vs LRGG
Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF vs Nomura Focused Large Growth ETF
Which is better, COWG or LRGG?
COWG has been ahead.
LRGG has a lower expense ratio. COWG led over 1Y and the full window. COWG is less concentrated, with 32.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 71.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | COWG | LRGG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.44%Best |
| AUM | $2.4B | $295M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.75% | 0.15% |
| Holdings | 204 | 44 |
| YTD Return | +13.88%Best | +3.29% |
| 1Y Return | +13.28%Best | +3.58% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.86% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.8% | 12.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -23.6% | -18.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.4 years | $15,338Best | $11,970 |
| Top 10 Weight | 32.7%Best | 71.4% |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Nomura Asset Management Co Ltd |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Dec 21, 2022 | May 14, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 15, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.4 years).
COWG vs LRGG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.4 years both funds cover.
COWG vs LRGG Performance
Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs and Nomura Focused Large Growth ETF (LRGG) is an ETF from Nomura Asset Management Co Ltd. Over the past year COWG returned +13.28% while LRGG returned +3.58%. Year to date, COWG is up 13.88% versus a gain of 3.29% for LRGG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
COWG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.8% compared with 12.4% for LRGG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.6% for COWG and -18.9% for LRGG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.59. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
COWG charges 0.49% per year while LRGG charges 0.44%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $44 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, COWG currently yields 0.75% against 0.15% for LRGG.
Holdings Overlap
5.1% of COWG's money is in holdings LRGG also owns. 36.9% of LRGG's money is in holdings COWG also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
6 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in COWG and 21 in LRGG, against full books of 204 and 44.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 12 positions for LRGG that do not appear in our book for COWG (52.2% of the fund), and 92 for COWG that do not appear in LRGG (91.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
36.9% of LRGG is already inside COWG.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, COWG or LRGG?
COWG has an expense ratio of 0.49% while LRGG charges 0.44%. LRGG is the cheaper option, by $5 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, COWG or LRGG?
Over the past year COWG returned +13.28% vs +3.58% for LRGG, so COWG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), COWG annualized +19.51% vs +7.78% for LRGG. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, COWG or LRGG?
COWG has been the more volatile fund at 15.8% annualized versus 12.4% for LRGG. Worst drawdown: COWG -23.6% vs LRGG -18.9%.
Should I hold both COWG and LRGG?
COWG and LRGG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.59, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between COWG and LRGG?
36.9% of LRGG's money is in holdings COWG also owns. 36.9% of LRGG's is in holdings COWG also owns. They hold 6 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in COWG and 21 in LRGG.
Which pays a higher dividend, COWG or LRGG?
COWG yields 0.75% while LRGG yields 0.15%, so COWG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is LRGG better than COWG?
LRGG has a lower expense ratio. COWG led over 1Y and the full window. COWG is less concentrated, with 32.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 71.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.