CPLS vs GTOH
AB Core Plus Bond ETF vs Invesco Short Duration High Yield ETF
Which is better, CPLS or GTOH?
GTOH has been ahead.
CPLS has a lower expense ratio. GTOH led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CPLS | GTOH |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.30%Best | 0.48% |
| AUM | $200M | $13M |
| Dividend Yield | 4.87% | 5.78% |
| Holdings | 818 | 397 |
| YTD Return | -2.78%Best | -4.05% |
| 1Y Return | -2.71% | - |
| Fund Family | AllianceBernstein L.P. | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Style | High Yield Bond | High Yield Bond |
| Inception | Dec 13, 2023 | Dec 9, 2022 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
CPLS vs GTOH growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
CPLS vs GTOH Performance
AB Core Plus Bond ETF (CPLS) is an ETF from AllianceBernstein L.P. and Invesco Short Duration High Yield ETF (GTOH) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, CPLS is down 2.78% versus a loss of 4.05% for GTOH.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CPLS charges 0.30% per year while GTOH charges 0.48%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $48 annually, a gap of $18 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CPLS currently yields 4.87% against 5.78% for GTOH.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 382 holdings in CPLS and 131 in GTOH, totalling 66.6% and 73.7% of the two funds. Neither is a share of a fund we can divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 5 positions appear in both.
5 positions in common, counted across the 382 positions we hold weights for in CPLS and 131 in GTOH, against full books of 818 and 397.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CPLS | Weight in GTOH | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NOVHOL 6.75 04/15/32Clydesdale Acquisition Holdings Inc Aka Novolex 6.75% 04/15/2032 | 0.20% | 0.41% | 0.21% |
| GT 5.25 07/15/31Goodyear Tire & Rubber, 5.25% 15jul2031, USD | 0.02% | 0.46% | 0.44% |
| IEP 4.375 02/01/29Icahn Enterprises Lp / Icahn Enterprises Finance Corp 4.38% 01Feb2029 | 0.22% | 0.16% | 0.06% |
| OI 7.25 05/15/31 144Owens-Brockway Glass Container Inc 7.25% 15May2031 | 0.05% | 0.23% | 0.18% |
| IEP 10 11/15/29 144AIcahn Enterprises/Fin Sr Secured 144A 11/29 10 | 0.04% | 0.10% | 0.06% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CPLS and GTOH you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CPLS or GTOH?
CPLS has an expense ratio of 0.30% while GTOH charges 0.48%. CPLS is the cheaper option, by $18 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, CPLS or GTOH?
CPLS yields 4.87% while GTOH yields 5.78%, so GTOH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is GTOH better than CPLS?
CPLS has a lower expense ratio. GTOH led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.