CPSL vs GPIX
Calamos Laddered S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF vs Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF
Which is better, CPSL or GPIX?
GPIX has been ahead.
GPIX has a lower expense ratio. GPIX led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. GPIX is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 83.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CPSL | GPIX |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.29%Best |
| AUM | $158M | $6.3B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 8.16% |
| Holdings | 14 | 496 |
| YTD Return | +4.30% | +13.52%Best |
| 1Y Return | +5.70% | +17.92%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +23.39% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 2.3%Best | 10.7% |
| Max Drawdown | -3.7%Best | -17.5% |
| $10,000 over 2.1 years | $11,385 | $14,356Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 83.3% | 38.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Calamos Investments | Goldman Sachs Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 9, 2024 | Oct 24, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 9, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.1 years).
CPSL vs GPIX growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.1 years both funds cover.
CPSL vs GPIX Performance
Calamos Laddered S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF (CPSL) is an ETF from Calamos Investments and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX) is an ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management. Over the past year CPSL returned +5.70% while GPIX returned +17.92%. Year to date, CPSL is up 4.30% versus a gain of 13.52% for GPIX.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GPIX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 10.7% compared with 2.3% for CPSL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -3.7% for CPSL and -17.5% for GPIX. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CPSL charges 0.79% per year while GPIX charges 0.29%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $29 annually, a gap of $50 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CPSL currently yields 0.00% against 8.16% for GPIX.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 12 holdings in CPSL and 491 in GPIX, totalling 99.9% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 12 positions we hold weights for in CPSL and 491 in GPIX, against full books of 14 and 496.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 468 positions for GPIX that do not appear in our book for CPSL (99.6% of the fund), and 12 for CPSL that do not appear in GPIX (99.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CPSL and GPIX you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CPSL or GPIX?
CPSL has an expense ratio of 0.79% while GPIX charges 0.29%. GPIX is the cheaper option, by $50 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CPSL or GPIX?
Over the past year CPSL returned +5.70% vs +17.92% for GPIX, so GPIX leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), CPSL annualized +6.37% vs +18.79% for GPIX. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CPSL or GPIX?
GPIX has been the more volatile fund at 10.7% annualized versus 2.3% for CPSL. Worst drawdown: CPSL -3.7% vs GPIX -17.5%.
Should I hold both CPSL and GPIX?
CPSL and GPIX have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, CPSL or GPIX?
CPSL yields 0.00% while GPIX yields 8.16%, so GPIX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is GPIX better than CPSL?
GPIX has a lower expense ratio. GPIX led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. GPIX is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 83.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.