CRAK vs GUNR
VanEck Oil Refiners ETF vs Northern Trust Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources ETF
Which is better, CRAK or GUNR?
CRAK has been ahead.
GUNR has a lower expense ratio. CRAK led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. GUNR is less concentrated, with 37.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 59.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CRAK | GUNR |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.61% | 0.46%Best |
| AUM | $183M | $7.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.19% | 2.34% |
| Holdings | 52 | 177 |
| YTD Return | +79.72%Best | +18.20% |
| 1Y Return | +92.04%Best | +27.47% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +28.82%Best | +13.49% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +19.55%Best | +10.26% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.8% | 19.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -58.8% | -45.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $24,420Best | $16,296 |
| Top 10 Weight | 59.8% | 37.3%Best |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Northern Trust Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Aug 18, 2015 | Sep 16, 2011 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 19, 2015 to Oct 14, 2026 (11.2 years).
CRAK vs GUNR growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 11.2 years both funds cover.
CRAK vs GUNR Performance
VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK) is an ETF from VanEck and Northern Trust Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources ETF (GUNR) is an ETF from Northern Trust Asset Management. Over the past year CRAK returned +92.04% while GUNR returned +27.47%. Year to date, CRAK is up 79.72% versus a gain of 18.20% for GUNR.
Over three years, CRAK compounded at +28.82% per year against +13.49% for GUNR; over five years the annualized figures are +19.55% and +10.26% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, CRAK has the edge at +14.10% annualized vs +8.56%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CRAK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.8% compared with 19.1% for GUNR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -58.8% for CRAK and -45.9% for GUNR. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CRAK charges 0.61% per year while GUNR charges 0.46%. On a $10,000 position that is $61 vs $46 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CRAK currently yields 1.19% against 2.34% for GUNR.
Holdings Overlap
5.5% of CRAK's money is in holdings GUNR also owns. 0.3% of GUNR's money is in holdings CRAK also owns.
CRAK and GUNR share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 26 positions we hold weights for in CRAK and 129 in GUNR, against full books of 52 and 177.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 33 positions for GUNR that do not appear in our book for CRAK (36.3% of the fund), and 8 for CRAK that do not appear in GUNR (35.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CRAK | Weight in GUNR | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| PKN:PLPolski Koncern Naftowy Orlen Sa | 5.52% | 0.34% | 5.18% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CRAK and GUNR you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CRAK or GUNR?
CRAK has an expense ratio of 0.61% while GUNR charges 0.46%. GUNR is the cheaper option, by $15 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CRAK or GUNR?
Over the past year CRAK returned +92.04% vs +27.47% for GUNR, so CRAK leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), CRAK annualized +14.10% vs +8.56% for GUNR. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CRAK or GUNR?
CRAK has been the more volatile fund at 23.8% annualized versus 19.1% for GUNR. Worst drawdown: CRAK -58.8% vs GUNR -45.9%.
Should I hold both CRAK and GUNR?
CRAK and GUNR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between CRAK and GUNR?
5.5% of CRAK's money is in holdings GUNR also owns. 0.3% of GUNR's is in holdings CRAK also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 26 positions we hold weights for in CRAK and 129 in GUNR.
Which pays a higher dividend, CRAK or GUNR?
CRAK yields 1.19% while GUNR yields 2.34%, so GUNR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is GUNR better than CRAK?
GUNR has a lower expense ratio. CRAK led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. GUNR is less concentrated, with 37.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 59.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.