CRAK vs HAP
VanEck Oil Refiners ETF vs VanEck Natural Resources ETF
Which is better, CRAK or HAP?
CRAK has been ahead.
HAP has a lower expense ratio. CRAK led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. HAP is less concentrated, with 36.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 59.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CRAK | HAP |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.61% | 0.41%Best |
| AUM | $183M | $335M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.19% | 1.87% |
| Holdings | 52 | 131 |
| YTD Return | +79.72%Best | +21.80% |
| 1Y Return | +92.04%Best | +33.46% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +28.82%Best | +17.08% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +19.55%Best | +11.74% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.8% | 18.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -58.8% | -44.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $24,420Best | $17,420 |
| Top 10 Weight | 59.8% | 36.9%Best |
| Fund Family | VanEck | VanEck |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Aug 18, 2015 | Aug 29, 2008 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 19, 2015 to Oct 14, 2026 (11.2 years).
CRAK vs HAP growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 11.2 years both funds cover.
CRAK vs HAP Performance
VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK) is an ETF from VanEck and VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP) is an ETF from VanEck. Over the past year CRAK returned +92.04% while HAP returned +33.46%. Year to date, CRAK is up 79.72% versus a gain of 21.80% for HAP.
Over three years, CRAK compounded at +28.82% per year against +17.08% for HAP; over five years the annualized figures are +19.55% and +11.74% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, CRAK has the edge at +14.10% annualized vs +10.95%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CRAK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.8% compared with 18.6% for HAP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -58.8% for CRAK and -44.1% for HAP. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CRAK charges 0.61% per year while HAP charges 0.41%. On a $10,000 position that is $61 vs $41 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CRAK currently yields 1.19% against 1.87% for HAP.
Holdings Overlap
29.9% of CRAK's money is in holdings HAP also owns. 3.1% of HAP's money is in holdings CRAK also owns.
CRAK and HAP share little of their money.
4 positions in common, counted across the 26 positions we hold weights for in CRAK and 134 in HAP, against full books of 52 and 131.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 49 positions for HAP that do not appear in our book for CRAK (51.3% of the fund), and 5 for CRAK that do not appear in HAP (12.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
29.9% of CRAK is already inside HAP.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CRAK or HAP?
CRAK has an expense ratio of 0.61% while HAP charges 0.41%. HAP is the cheaper option, by $20 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CRAK or HAP?
Over the past year CRAK returned +92.04% vs +33.46% for HAP, so CRAK leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), CRAK annualized +14.10% vs +10.95% for HAP. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CRAK or HAP?
CRAK has been the more volatile fund at 23.8% annualized versus 18.6% for HAP. Worst drawdown: CRAK -58.8% vs HAP -44.1%.
Should I hold both CRAK and HAP?
CRAK and HAP have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between CRAK and HAP?
29.9% of CRAK's money is in holdings HAP also owns. 3.1% of HAP's is in holdings CRAK also owns. They hold 4 positions in common, counted across the 26 positions we hold weights for in CRAK and 134 in HAP.
Which pays a higher dividend, CRAK or HAP?
CRAK yields 1.19% while HAP yields 1.87%, so HAP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is HAP better than CRAK?
HAP has a lower expense ratio. CRAK led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. HAP is less concentrated, with 36.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 59.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.