CRSH vs PFEB
YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF vs Innovator US Equity Power Buffer ETF - February
Which is better, CRSH or PFEB?
PFEB has been ahead.
PFEB has a lower expense ratio. PFEB led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CRSH | PFEB |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.05% | 0.79%Best |
| AUM | $14M | $896M |
| Dividend Yield | 79.84% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 26 | 18 |
| YTD Return | +11.27%Best | +8.65% |
| 1Y Return | +11.88% | +12.00%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.79% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +8.98% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 40.2% | 5.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -61.5% | -10.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.5 years | $4,932 | $13,190Best |
| Fund Family | YieldMax ETF | Innovator ETFs Trust |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | May 1, 2024 | Jan 31, 2020 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 2, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.5 years).
CRSH vs PFEB growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.5 years both funds cover.
CRSH vs PFEB Performance
YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) is an ETF from YieldMax ETF and Innovator US Equity Power Buffer ETF - February (PFEB) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year CRSH returned +11.88% while PFEB returned +12.00%. Year to date, CRSH is up 11.27% versus a gain of 8.65% for PFEB.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CRSH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 40.2% compared with 5.4% for PFEB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -61.5% for CRSH and -10.6% for PFEB. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.42. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CRSH charges 1.05% per year while PFEB charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $105 vs $79 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CRSH currently yields 79.84% against 0.00% for PFEB.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CRSH and PFEB you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CRSH or PFEB?
CRSH has an expense ratio of 1.05% while PFEB charges 0.79%. PFEB is the cheaper option, by $26 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CRSH or PFEB?
Over the past year CRSH returned +11.88% vs +12.00% for PFEB, so PFEB leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CRSH or PFEB?
CRSH has been the more volatile fund at 40.2% annualized versus 5.4% for PFEB. Worst drawdown: CRSH -61.5% vs PFEB -10.6%.
Should I hold both CRSH and PFEB?
CRSH and PFEB have a monthly-return correlation of -0.42, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, CRSH or PFEB?
CRSH yields 79.84% while PFEB yields 0.00%, so CRSH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PFEB better than CRSH?
PFEB has a lower expense ratio. PFEB led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.