CRUX vs SIO
Columbia Core Bond ETF vs Touchstone Strategic Income ETF
Which is better, CRUX or SIO?
CRUX has been ahead.
CRUX has a lower expense ratio. CRUX led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CRUX | SIO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.32%Best | 0.50% |
| AUM | $2.2B | $292M |
| Dividend Yield | 2.27% | 7.65% |
| Holdings | 959 | 205 |
| YTD Return | -2.57% | -1.08%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | -0.02% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +7.19% |
| Fund Family | Columbia Threadneedle Investments | Touchstone Investments |
| Category | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Style | Intermediate Term Bond | Intermediate Term Bond |
| Inception | Mar 16, 2026 | Jul 21, 2022 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
CRUX vs SIO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
CRUX vs SIO Performance
Columbia Core Bond ETF (CRUX) is an ETF from Columbia Threadneedle Investments and Touchstone Strategic Income ETF (SIO) is an ETF from Touchstone Investments. Year to date, CRUX is down 2.57% versus a loss of 1.08% for SIO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CRUX charges 0.32% per year while SIO charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $32 vs $50 annually, a gap of $18 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CRUX currently yields 2.27% against 7.65% for SIO.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 128 holdings in CRUX and 105 in SIO, totalling 25.4% and 42.6% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 128 positions we hold weights for in CRUX and 105 in SIO, against full books of 959 and 205.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CRUX and SIO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CRUX or SIO?
CRUX has an expense ratio of 0.32% while SIO charges 0.50%. CRUX is the cheaper option, by $18 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, CRUX or SIO?
CRUX yields 2.27% while SIO yields 7.65%, so SIO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SIO better than CRUX?
CRUX has a lower expense ratio. CRUX led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.