CRUX vs TABD
Columbia Core Bond ETF vs Transamerica Bond Active ETF
Which is better, CRUX or TABD?
CRUX costs less.
CRUX has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CRUX | TABD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.32%Best | 0.39% |
| AUM | $2.2B | $151M |
| Dividend Yield | 2.27% | 3.85% |
| Holdings | 959 | 405 |
| YTD Return | -2.57% | -1.68%Best |
| Fund Family | Columbia Threadneedle Investments | Transamerica |
| Category | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Style | Intermediate Term Bond | Intermediate Term Bond |
| Inception | Mar 16, 2026 | Dec 15, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
CRUX vs TABD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
CRUX vs TABD Performance
Columbia Core Bond ETF (CRUX) is an ETF from Columbia Threadneedle Investments and Transamerica Bond Active ETF (TABD) is an ETF from Transamerica. Year to date, CRUX is down 2.57% versus a loss of 1.68% for TABD.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CRUX charges 0.32% per year while TABD charges 0.39%. On a $10,000 position that is $32 vs $39 annually, a gap of $7 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CRUX currently yields 2.27% against 3.85% for TABD.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 128 holdings in CRUX and 200 in TABD, totalling 25.4% and 43.0% of the two funds. Neither is a share of a fund we can divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 5 positions appear in both.
5 positions in common, counted across the 128 positions we hold weights for in CRUX and 200 in TABD, against full books of 959 and 405.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CRUX | Weight in TABD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FNCL 5.5 10/11Fannie Mae Or Freddie Mac 2050-10-01 | 2.88% | 2.75% | 0.13% |
| FNCL 6 10/11Fannie Mae Or Freddie Mac 6 | 1.07% | 1.26% | 0.19% |
| T 4 11/15/52United States Treasury Note/Bond | 0.44% | 0.04% | 0.40% |
| BA 5.93 05/01/60Boeing Co Sr Unsecured 05/60 5.93 5.93 2060-05-01 | 0.01% | 0.13% | 0.12% |
| TMUST-Mobile Usa, Inc. 3.875% 15-Apr-2030 | 0.05% | 0.07% | 0.02% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CRUX and TABD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CRUX or TABD?
CRUX has an expense ratio of 0.32% while TABD charges 0.39%. CRUX is the cheaper option, by $7 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, CRUX or TABD?
CRUX yields 2.27% while TABD yields 3.85%, so TABD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TABD better than CRUX?
CRUX has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.