CRWL vs QQQ
GraniteShares 2x Long CRWD Daily ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, CRWL or QQQ?
Multi Alternative against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. CRWL led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CRWL | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.50% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $153M | $506.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.42% |
| Holdings | 4 | 321 |
| YTD Return | +216.25%Best | +19.30% |
| 1Y Return | +154.44%Best | +22.47% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +26.18% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.42% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 134.0% | 18.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -65.0% | -22.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.9 years | $35,752Best | $14,304 |
| Fund Family | GraniteShares | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Nov 11, 2024 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 12, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.9 years).
CRWL vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.9 years both funds cover.
CRWL vs QQQ Performance
GraniteShares 2x Long CRWD Daily ETF (CRWL) is an ETF from GraniteShares and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year CRWL returned +154.44% while QQQ returned +22.47%. Year to date, CRWL is up 216.25% versus a gain of 19.30% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CRWL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 134.0% compared with 18.8% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -65.0% for CRWL and -22.8% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.59. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CRWL charges 1.50% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $150 vs $18 annually, a gap of $132 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CRWL currently yields 0.00% against 0.42% for QQQ.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CRWL and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CRWL or QQQ?
CRWL has an expense ratio of 1.50% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $132 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CRWL or QQQ?
Over the past year CRWL returned +154.44% vs +22.47% for QQQ, so CRWL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), CRWL annualized +95.53% vs +20.73% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CRWL or QQQ?
CRWL has been the more volatile fund at 134.0% annualized versus 18.8% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: CRWL -65.0% vs QQQ -22.8%.
Should I hold both CRWL and QQQ?
CRWL and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.59, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, CRWL or QQQ?
CRWL yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than CRWL?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. CRWL led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.