CRWU vs VTI
T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, CRWU or VTI?
Trading-Leveraged Equity against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CRWU | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.50% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $23M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.21% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 3 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +211.42%Best | +13.02% |
| 1Y Return | -19.11% | +16.63%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.97% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.99% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 1065.5% | 11.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -94.3% | -8.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.2 years | $8,254 | $12,144Best |
| Fund Family | REX Shares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Leveraged Equity | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 25, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 25, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.2 years).
CRWU vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.2 years both funds cover.
CRWU vs VTI Performance
T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF (CRWU) is an ETF from REX Shares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CRWU returned -19.11% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, CRWU is up 211.42% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CRWU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 1065.5% compared with 11.8% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -94.3% for CRWU and -8.9% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.19. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CRWU charges 1.50% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $150 vs $3 annually, a gap of $147 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CRWU currently yields 1.21% against 1.06% for VTI.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CRWU and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CRWU or VTI?
CRWU has an expense ratio of 1.50% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $147 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CRWU or VTI?
Over the past year CRWU returned -19.11% vs +16.63% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), CRWU annualized -14.78% vs +17.57% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CRWU or VTI?
CRWU has been the more volatile fund at 1065.5% annualized versus 11.8% for VTI. Worst drawdown: CRWU -94.3% vs VTI -8.9%.
Should I hold both CRWU and VTI?
CRWU and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.19, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, CRWU or VTI?
CRWU yields 1.21% while VTI yields 1.06%, so CRWU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than CRWU?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.