DAUG vs ZAPR

DAUG vs ZAPR

Which is better, DAUG or ZAPR?

DAUG has been ahead.

ZAPR has a lower expense ratio. DAUG led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: ZAPRHigher Returns: DAUG

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricDAUGZAPR
Expense Ratio0.85%0.79%Best
AUM$446M$68M
Dividend Yield0.00%0.00%
Holdings1021
YTD Return+7.66%Best+5.06%
1Y Return+9.87%Best+6.36%
3Y Return (annualized)+12.57%-
5Y Return (annualized)+6.73%-
Volatility (annualized)6.0%1.1%Best
Max Drawdown-6.9%-1.7%Best
$10,000 over 1.5 years$12,228Best$11,037
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)Innovator ETFs Trust
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleMulti AlternativeMulti Alternative
InceptionNov 6, 2019Apr 1, 2025

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.5 years).

DAUG vs ZAPR growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.5 years both funds cover.

Compare DAUG against instead:DAUG vs SPYDAUG vs QQQDAUG vs VOODAUG vs VTIZAPR against:ZAPR vs VXUS

DAUG vs ZAPR Performance

FT Vest US Equity Deep Buffer ETF - August (DAUG) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr April (ZAPR) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year DAUG returned +9.87% while ZAPR returned +6.36%. Year to date, DAUG is up 7.66% versus a gain of 5.06% for ZAPR.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

DAUG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 6.0% compared with 1.1% for ZAPR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -6.9% for DAUG and -1.7% for ZAPR. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

DAUG charges 0.85% per year while ZAPR charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $79 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DAUG currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for ZAPR.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of DAUG and ZAPR you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

DAUGZAPR

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, DAUG or ZAPR?

DAUG has an expense ratio of 0.85% while ZAPR charges 0.79%. ZAPR is the cheaper option, by $6 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, DAUG or ZAPR?

Over the past year DAUG returned +9.87% vs +6.36% for ZAPR, so DAUG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), DAUG annualized +14.35% vs +6.80% for ZAPR. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, DAUG or ZAPR?

DAUG has been the more volatile fund at 6.0% annualized versus 1.1% for ZAPR. Worst drawdown: DAUG -6.9% vs ZAPR -1.7%.

Should I hold both DAUG and ZAPR?

DAUG and ZAPR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, DAUG or ZAPR?

DAUG yields 0.00% while ZAPR yields 0.00%, so ZAPR currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is ZAPR better than DAUG?

ZAPR has a lower expense ratio. DAUG led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.