DBEM vs NSI
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF vs National Security Emerging Markets Index ETF
Which is better, DBEM or NSI?
DBEM has been ahead.
DBEM has a lower expense ratio. DBEM led over 1Y and the full window. DBEM is less concentrated, with 38.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 50.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DBEM | NSI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.66%Best | 0.75% |
| AUM | $108M | $43M |
| Dividend Yield | 2.14% | 1.21% |
| Holdings | 2,304 | 204 |
| YTD Return | +16.22%Best | +8.60% |
| 1Y Return | +25.31%Best | +17.93% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.07% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.80% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.0% | 12.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -15.1%Best | -16.6% |
| $10,000 over 2.9 years | $18,086Best | $16,304 |
| Top 10 Weight | 38.4%Best | 50.4% |
| Fund Family | Xtrackers ETFs | National Security Index |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 9, 2011 | Dec 6, 2023 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 7, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.9 years).
DBEM vs NSI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.9 years both funds cover.
DBEM vs NSI Performance
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF (DBEM) is an ETF from Xtrackers ETFs and National Security Emerging Markets Index ETF (NSI) is an ETF from National Security Index. Over the past year DBEM returned +25.31% while NSI returned +17.93%. Year to date, DBEM is up 16.22% versus a gain of 8.60% for NSI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DBEM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.0% compared with 12.9% for NSI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.1% for DBEM and -16.6% for NSI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DBEM charges 0.66% per year while NSI charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $66 vs $75 annually, a gap of $9 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DBEM currently yields 2.14% against 1.21% for NSI.
Holdings Overlap
18.9% of DBEM's money is in holdings NSI also owns. 39.7% of NSI's money is in holdings DBEM also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
22 positions in common, counted across the 1,136 positions we hold weights for in DBEM and 99 in NSI, against full books of 2,304 and 204.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 32 positions for NSI that do not appear in our book for DBEM (24.6% of the fund), and 8 for DBEM that do not appear in NSI (0.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DBEM | Weight in NSI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2330:TWTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd | 15.83% | 15.50% | 0.33% |
| 009150:KRSamsung Electro-Mechanics Co. Ltd., Preference Shares | 0.53% | 10.07% | 9.54% |
| 2317:TWHon Hai Precision Industry Co Ltd | 0.77% | 3.47% | 2.70% |
| PDD:IEPdd Holdings Inc. | 0.32% | 2.15% | 1.83% |
| 9999:HKNetease Inc | 0.34% | 1.99% | 1.65% |
| YMM:SHFull Truck A-Adr | 0.05% | 1.10% | 1.05% |
| AMX:MXAmérica Móvil, Sab De Cv, Class B (Adr) | 0.13% | 0.81% | 0.68% |
| GFI:ZAGold Fields Limited Sponsored Adr (1 Ads : 1 Ordinary) | 0.25% | 0.47% | 0.22% |
| TCOM:SHTrip.Com Group Limited Sponsored Adr (1 Ads : 0.5 Ordinary) | 0.02% | 0.61% | 0.59% |
| BSAC:CLBanco Santander-Chile Sponsored Adr (1 Ads : 400 Ordinary) | 0.04% | 0.56% | 0.52% |
39.7% of NSI is already inside DBEM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DBEM or NSI?
DBEM has an expense ratio of 0.66% while NSI charges 0.75%. DBEM is the cheaper option, by $9 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DBEM or NSI?
Over the past year DBEM returned +25.31% vs +17.93% for NSI, so DBEM leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DBEM or NSI?
DBEM has been the more volatile fund at 14.0% annualized versus 12.9% for NSI. Worst drawdown: DBEM -15.1% vs NSI -16.6%.
Should I hold both DBEM and NSI?
DBEM and NSI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between DBEM and NSI?
39.7% of NSI's money is in holdings DBEM also owns. 39.7% of NSI's is in holdings DBEM also owns. They hold 22 positions in common, counted across the 1,136 positions we hold weights for in DBEM and 99 in NSI.
Which pays a higher dividend, DBEM or NSI?
DBEM yields 2.14% while NSI yields 1.21%, so DBEM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is NSI better than DBEM?
DBEM has a lower expense ratio. DBEM led over 1Y and the full window. DBEM is less concentrated, with 38.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 50.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.