DECM vs DJAN

DECM vs DJAN

Which is better, DECM or DJAN?

DJAN has been ahead.

DJAN led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.99.

Lower Fees: TiedHigher Returns: DJAN

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricDECMDJAN
Expense Ratio0.85%Tie0.85%Tie
AUM$35M$455M
Dividend Yield0.00%0.00%
Holdings1010
YTD Return+4.70%+7.90%Best
1Y Return+6.60%+11.42%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+12.54%
5Y Return (annualized)-+7.97%
Volatility (annualized)2.5%Best6.0%
Max Drawdown-3.0%Best-9.3%
$10,000 over 1.8 years$11,155$12,002Best
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)First Trust Portfolios (US)
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleMulti AlternativeMulti Alternative
InceptionDec 20, 2024Jan 15, 2021

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 23, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.8 years).

DECM vs DJAN growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.8 years both funds cover.

Compare DECM against instead:DECM vs SPYDECM vs QQQDECM vs VOODECM vs VTIDJAN against:DJAN vs VXUS

DECM vs DJAN Performance

FT Vest US Equity Max Buffer ETF - December (DECM) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and FT Vest US Equity Deep Buffer ETF - January (DJAN) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year DECM returned +6.60% while DJAN returned +11.42%. Year to date, DECM is up 4.70% versus a gain of 7.90% for DJAN.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

DJAN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 6.0% compared with 2.5% for DECM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -3.0% for DECM and -9.3% for DJAN. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.99. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

DECM charges 0.85% per year while DJAN charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $85 annually. On income, DECM currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for DJAN.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of DECM and DJAN you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

DECMDJAN

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, DECM or DJAN?

DECM has an expense ratio of 0.85% while DJAN charges 0.85%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.

Which performed better, DECM or DJAN?

Over the past year DECM returned +6.60% vs +11.42% for DJAN, so DJAN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), DECM annualized +6.26% vs +10.67% for DJAN. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, DECM or DJAN?

DJAN has been the more volatile fund at 6.0% annualized versus 2.5% for DECM. Worst drawdown: DECM -3.0% vs DJAN -9.3%.

Should I hold both DECM and DJAN?

DECM and DJAN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.99, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, DECM or DJAN?

DECM yields 0.00% while DJAN yields 0.00%, so DJAN currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is DJAN better than DECM?

DJAN led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.99. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.