DECP vs LOCT
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - December vs Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - October
Which is better, DECP or LOCT?
DECP has been ahead.
DECP has a lower expense ratio. DECP led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DECP | LOCT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50%Best | 0.79% |
| AUM | $34M | $11M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 5.18% |
| Holdings | 14 | 12 |
| YTD Return | +10.38%Best | -0.06% |
| 1Y Return | +14.98%Best | +1.20% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | -0.04% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 6.8% | 1.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -12.1% | -4.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.4 years | $13,426Best | $10,846 |
| Fund Family | PGIM Investments | Innovator ETFs Trust |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | May 24, 2024 | Oct 2, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 24, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.4 years).
DECP vs LOCT growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.4 years both funds cover.
DECP vs LOCT Performance
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - December (DECP) is an ETF from PGIM Investments and Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - October (LOCT) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year DECP returned +14.98% while LOCT returned +1.20%. Year to date, DECP is up 10.38% versus a loss of 0.06% for LOCT.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DECP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 6.8% compared with 1.7% for LOCT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.1% for DECP and -4.7% for LOCT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DECP charges 0.50% per year while LOCT charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $79 annually, a gap of $29 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DECP currently yields 0.00% against 5.18% for LOCT.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of DECP and LOCT you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DECP or LOCT?
DECP has an expense ratio of 0.50% while LOCT charges 0.79%. DECP is the cheaper option, by $29 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DECP or LOCT?
Over the past year DECP returned +14.98% vs +1.20% for LOCT, so DECP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), DECP annualized +13.06% vs +3.44% for LOCT. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DECP or LOCT?
DECP has been the more volatile fund at 6.8% annualized versus 1.7% for LOCT. Worst drawdown: DECP -12.1% vs LOCT -4.7%.
Should I hold both DECP and LOCT?
DECP and LOCT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, DECP or LOCT?
DECP yields 0.00% while LOCT yields 5.18%, so LOCT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is LOCT better than DECP?
DECP has a lower expense ratio. DECP led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.