DECP vs MRCP
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - December vs PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - March
Which is better, DECP or MRCP?
Each has led over a different period.
DECP led over 1Y, MRCP over the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DECP | MRCP |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50%Tie | 0.50%Tie |
| AUM | $34M | $30M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 14 | 16 |
| YTD Return | +10.38% | +10.54%Best |
| 1Y Return | +14.98%Best | +14.01% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 6.8% | 6.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -12.1% | -10.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.4 years | $13,426 | $13,733Best |
| Fund Family | PGIM Investments | PGIM Investments |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | May 24, 2024 | Feb 29, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 24, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.4 years).
DECP vs MRCP growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.4 years both funds cover.
DECP vs MRCP Performance
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - December (DECP) is an ETF from PGIM Investments and PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - March (MRCP) is an ETF from PGIM Investments. Over the past year DECP returned +14.98% while MRCP returned +14.01%. Year to date, DECP is up 10.38% versus a gain of 10.54% for MRCP.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DECP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 6.8% compared with 6.2% for MRCP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.1% for DECP and -10.7% for MRCP. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DECP charges 0.50% per year while MRCP charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $50 annually. On income, DECP currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for MRCP.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of DECP and MRCP you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DECP or MRCP?
DECP has an expense ratio of 0.50% while MRCP charges 0.50%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which performed better, DECP or MRCP?
Over the past year DECP returned +14.98% vs +14.01% for MRCP, so DECP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), DECP annualized +13.06% vs +14.13% for MRCP. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DECP or MRCP?
DECP has been the more volatile fund at 6.8% annualized versus 6.2% for MRCP. Worst drawdown: DECP -12.1% vs MRCP -10.7%.
Should I hold both DECP and MRCP?
DECP and MRCP have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, DECP or MRCP?
DECP yields 0.00% while MRCP yields 0.00%, so MRCP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is MRCP better than DECP?
DECP led over 1Y, MRCP over the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.