DEPW vs PCLG
Google DeepMind AI Lab Ecosystem ETF vs Polen Focus Growth ETF
Which is better, DEPW or PCLG?
PCLG costs less.
PCLG has a lower expense ratio. DEPW is less concentrated, with 60.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 62.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DEPW | PCLG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.49%Best |
| AUM | $2M | $92M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.04% |
| Holdings | 25 | 27 |
| YTD Return | -7.34% | -5.60%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | -8.10% |
| Top 10 Weight | 60.0%Best | 62.6% |
| Fund Family | Harbor Funds | Polen Capital |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Aug 12, 2026 | Sep 30, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
DEPW vs PCLG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
DEPW vs PCLG Performance
Google DeepMind AI Lab Ecosystem ETF (DEPW) is an ETF from Harbor Funds and Polen Focus Growth ETF (PCLG) is an ETF from Polen Capital. Year to date, DEPW is down 7.34% versus a loss of 5.60% for PCLG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DEPW charges 0.59% per year while PCLG charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $49 annually, a gap of $10 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DEPW currently yields 0.00% against 0.04% for PCLG.
Holdings Overlap
8.0% of DEPW's money is in holdings PCLG also owns. 8.1% of PCLG's money is in holdings DEPW also owns.
PCLG and DEPW share little of their money.
2 positions in common, counted across the 25 positions we hold weights for in DEPW and 29 in PCLG, against full books of 25 and 27.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 23 positions for PCLG that do not appear in our book for DEPW (84.7% of the fund), and 18 for DEPW that do not appear in PCLG (76.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of DEPW and PCLG you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DEPW or PCLG?
DEPW has an expense ratio of 0.59% while PCLG charges 0.49%. PCLG is the cheaper option, by $10 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between DEPW and PCLG?
8.1% of PCLG's money is in holdings DEPW also owns. 8.1% of PCLG's is in holdings DEPW also owns. They hold 2 positions in common, counted across the 25 positions we hold weights for in DEPW and 29 in PCLG.
Which pays a higher dividend, DEPW or PCLG?
DEPW yields 0.00% while PCLG yields 0.04%, so PCLG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PCLG better than DEPW?
PCLG has a lower expense ratio. DEPW is less concentrated, with 60.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 62.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.