DFAS vs FLQS

DFAS vs FLQS

Which is better, DFAS or FLQS?

Nearly the same fund. DFAS costs less.

DFAS has a lower expense ratio. DFAS led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97.

Lower Fees: DFASHigher Returns: DFAS

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricDFASFLQS
Expense Ratio0.27%Best0.35%
AUM$34.2B$50M
Dividend Yield1.04%1.57%
Holdings2,060497
YTD Return+10.62%Best+9.82%
1Y Return+14.08%Best+9.87%
3Y Return (annualized)+15.46%Best+12.65%
5Y Return (annualized)+7.05%Best+5.25%
Volatility (annualized)18.9%18.1%Best
Max Drawdown-26.1%Best-28.1%
$10,000 over 5 years$14,058Best$12,915
Fund FamilyDimensionalFranklin Templeton Investments (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleSmall Cap BlendSmall Cap Blend
InceptionDec 15, 1998Apr 26, 2017

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 14, 2021 to Oct 14, 2026 (5.3 years).

DFAS vs FLQS growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.3 years both funds cover.

Compare DFAS against instead:DFAS vs SPYDFAS vs QQQDFAS vs VOODFAS vs VTIFLQS against:FLQS vs VXUS

DFAS vs FLQS Performance

Dimensional US Small Cap ETF (DFAS) is an ETF from Dimensional and Franklin US Small Cap Multifactor Index ETF (FLQS) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US). Over the past year DFAS returned +14.08% while FLQS returned +9.87%. Year to date, DFAS is up 10.62% versus a gain of 9.82% for FLQS.

Over three years, DFAS compounded at +15.46% per year against +12.65% for FLQS; over five years the annualized figures are +7.05% and +5.25% respectively.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

DFAS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.9% compared with 18.1% for FLQS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -26.1% for DFAS and -28.1% for FLQS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.97. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

DFAS charges 0.27% per year while FLQS charges 0.35%. On a $10,000 position that is $27 vs $35 annually, a gap of $8 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DFAS currently yields 1.04% against 1.57% for FLQS.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 1,552 holdings in DFAS and 491 in FLQS, totalling 93.8% and 99.3% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

0 positions in common, counted across the 1,552 positions we hold weights for in DFAS and 491 in FLQS, against full books of 2,060 and 497.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of DFAS and FLQS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

DFASFLQS

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, DFAS or FLQS?

DFAS has an expense ratio of 0.27% while FLQS charges 0.35%. DFAS is the cheaper option, by $8 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, DFAS or FLQS?

Over the past year DFAS returned +14.08% vs +9.87% for FLQS, so DFAS leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, DFAS or FLQS?

DFAS has been the more volatile fund at 18.9% annualized versus 18.1% for FLQS. Worst drawdown: DFAS -26.1% vs FLQS -28.1%.

Should I hold both DFAS and FLQS?

DFAS and FLQS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.97, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, DFAS or FLQS?

DFAS yields 1.04% while FLQS yields 1.57%, so FLQS currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is FLQS better than DFAS?

DFAS has a lower expense ratio. DFAS led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.