DFLV vs MAVF
Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF vs Matrix Advisors Value ETF
Which is better, DFLV or MAVF?
Each has led over a different period.
DFLV has a lower expense ratio. DFLV led over 1Y, MAVF over the full window. DFLV is less concentrated, with 25.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 53.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DFLV | MAVF |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.21%Best | 0.75% |
| AUM | $7.0B | $92M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.33% | 0.37% |
| Holdings | 339 | 29 |
| YTD Return | +19.86%Best | +14.52% |
| 1Y Return | +28.61%Best | +21.88% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.49% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.5%Best | 14.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -14.0%Best | -16.4% |
| $10,000 over 1.6 years | $13,443 | $13,674Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 25.0%Best | 53.1% |
| Fund Family | Dimensional | Matrix Asset Advisors |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Dec 6, 2022 | Sep 16, 1983 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 24, 2025 to Oct 13, 2026 (1.6 years).
DFLV vs MAVF growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.6 years both funds cover.
DFLV vs MAVF Performance
Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF (DFLV) is an ETF from Dimensional and Matrix Advisors Value ETF (MAVF) is an ETF from Matrix Asset Advisors. Over the past year DFLV returned +28.61% while MAVF returned +21.88%. Year to date, DFLV is up 19.86% versus a gain of 14.52% for MAVF.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MAVF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.3% compared with 10.5% for DFLV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.0% for DFLV and -16.4% for MAVF. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DFLV charges 0.21% per year while MAVF charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $21 vs $75 annually, a gap of $54 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DFLV currently yields 1.33% against 0.37% for MAVF.
Holdings Overlap
19.4% of DFLV's money is in holdings MAVF also owns. 58.9% of MAVF's money is in holdings DFLV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
18 positions in common, counted across the 335 positions we hold weights for in DFLV and 28 in MAVF, against full books of 339 and 29.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 335 and 28 positions we hold weights for.
DFLV holds 253 positions MAVF does not, 78.2% of the fund.
Largest: XOM 3.69%, JNJ 2.34%, CVX 1.96%, BRK.B 1.88%, UNH 1.42%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DFLV | Weight in MAVF | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.34% | 6.45% | 2.11% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 4.70% | 3.37% | 1.33% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.08% | 5.07% | 2.99% |
| WFCWells Fargo & Co. | 1.12% | 3.71% | 2.59% |
| TELTE Connectivity PLC Common Stock | 0.75% | 3.57% | 2.82% |
| MDTMedtronic Plc Ordinary Shares | 0.47% | 3.73% | 3.26% |
| MSMorgan Stanley | 1.10% | 3.08% | 1.98% |
| TMOThermo Fisherscientific Inc. | 0.87% | 3.15% | 2.28% |
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 0.04% | 3.84% | 3.80% |
| PNCPnc Financial Services Group Inc. | 0.23% | 3.35% | 3.12% |
58.9% of MAVF is already inside DFLV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DFLV or MAVF?
DFLV has an expense ratio of 0.21% while MAVF charges 0.75%. DFLV is the cheaper option, by $54 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DFLV or MAVF?
Over the past year DFLV returned +28.61% vs +21.88% for MAVF, so DFLV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), DFLV annualized +20.31% vs +21.60% for MAVF. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DFLV or MAVF?
MAVF has been the more volatile fund at 14.3% annualized versus 10.5% for DFLV. Worst drawdown: DFLV -14.0% vs MAVF -16.4%.
Should I hold both DFLV and MAVF?
DFLV and MAVF have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between DFLV and MAVF?
58.9% of MAVF's money is in holdings DFLV also owns. 58.9% of MAVF's is in holdings DFLV also owns. They hold 18 positions in common, counted across the 335 positions we hold weights for in DFLV and 28 in MAVF.
Which pays a higher dividend, DFLV or MAVF?
DFLV yields 1.33% while MAVF yields 0.37%, so DFLV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is MAVF better than DFLV?
DFLV has a lower expense ratio. DFLV led over 1Y, MAVF over the full window. DFLV is less concentrated, with 25.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 53.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.