DFLV vs REVS
Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF vs Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF
Which is better, DFLV or REVS?
Nearly the same fund. REVS costs less.
REVS has a lower expense ratio. DFLV led over 1Y, REVS over 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97. DFLV is less concentrated, with 25.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DFLV | REVS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.22% | 0.19%Best |
| AUM | $7.2B | $370M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.41% | 1.84% |
| Holdings | 339 | 611 |
| YTD Return | +19.75%Best | +18.22% |
| 1Y Return | +27.39%Best | +23.33% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.43% | +20.60%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.45% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.2% | 12.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -16.8% | -16.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.9 years | $17,816 | $18,263Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 25.0%Best | 33.6% |
| Fund Family | Dimensional | Columbia Threadneedle Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Dec 6, 2022 | Sep 25, 2019 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 7, 2022 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.9 years).
DFLV vs REVS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.9 years both funds cover.
DFLV vs REVS Performance
Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF (DFLV) is an ETF from Dimensional and Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF (REVS) is an ETF from Columbia Threadneedle Investments. Over the past year DFLV returned +27.39% while REVS returned +23.33%. Year to date, DFLV is up 19.75% versus a gain of 18.22% for REVS.
Over three years, DFLV compounded at +20.43% per year against +20.60% for REVS. Across the full 4-year window we track, REVS has the edge at +16.70% annualized vs +15.96%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DFLV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.2% compared with 12.3% for REVS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.8% for DFLV and -16.4% for REVS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.97. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DFLV charges 0.22% per year while REVS charges 0.19%. On a $10,000 position that is $22 vs $19 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DFLV currently yields 1.41% against 1.84% for REVS.
Holdings Overlap
30.6% of DFLV's money is in holdings REVS also owns. 54.7% of REVS's money is in holdings DFLV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
107 positions in common, counted across the 335 positions we hold weights for in DFLV and 298 in REVS, against full books of 339 and 611.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 180 positions for REVS that do not appear in our book for DFLV (43.9% of the fund), and 180 for DFLV that do not appear in REVS (67.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DFLV | Weight in REVS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVXChevron Corp | 1.96% | 2.92% | 0.96% |
| BACBank of America Corp.: Financials | 0.88% | 3.84% | 2.96% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.08% | 2.05% | 0.03% |
| NEMNewmont Corp Common | 1.01% | 1.43% | 0.42% |
| CCitigroup Inc. | 0.47% | 1.96% | 1.49% |
| BMYBristol-Myers Squibb Co. | 0.64% | 1.72% | 1.08% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 0.72% | 1.62% | 0.90% |
| GMGeneral Motors Co | 0.86% | 1.47% | 0.61% |
| COPConocophillips Common Stock USD 0.01 | 1.00% | 1.23% | 0.23% |
| TGTTARGET CORP | 0.72% | 1.23% | 0.51% |
54.7% of REVS is already inside DFLV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DFLV or REVS?
DFLV has an expense ratio of 0.22% while REVS charges 0.19%. REVS is the cheaper option, by $3 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DFLV or REVS?
Over the past year DFLV returned +27.39% vs +23.33% for REVS, so DFLV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), DFLV annualized +15.96% vs +16.70% for REVS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DFLV or REVS?
DFLV has been the more volatile fund at 13.2% annualized versus 12.3% for REVS. Worst drawdown: DFLV -16.8% vs REVS -16.4%.
Should I hold both DFLV and REVS?
DFLV and REVS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.97, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between DFLV and REVS?
54.7% of REVS's money is in holdings DFLV also owns. 54.7% of REVS's is in holdings DFLV also owns. They hold 107 positions in common, counted across the 335 positions we hold weights for in DFLV and 298 in REVS.
Which pays a higher dividend, DFLV or REVS?
DFLV yields 1.41% while REVS yields 1.84%, so REVS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is REVS better than DFLV?
REVS has a lower expense ratio. DFLV led over 1Y, REVS over 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97. DFLV is less concentrated, with 25.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.