DFLV vs SASS
Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF vs M.D. Sass Concentrated Value ETF
Which is better, DFLV or SASS?
DFLV costs less.
DFLV has a lower expense ratio. DFLV is less concentrated, with 25.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DFLV | SASS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.22%Best | 0.75% |
| AUM | $7.2B | $76M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.41% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 339 | 24 |
| YTD Return | +19.75%Best | -7.30% |
| 1Y Return | +27.39% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.43% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 25.0%Best | 57.2% |
| Fund Family | Dimensional | MD Sass |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Dec 6, 2022 | Mar 4, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
DFLV vs SASS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
DFLV vs SASS Performance
Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF (DFLV) is an ETF from Dimensional and M.D. Sass Concentrated Value ETF (SASS) is an ETF from MD Sass. Year to date, DFLV is up 19.75% versus a loss of 7.30% for SASS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DFLV charges 0.22% per year while SASS charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $22 vs $75 annually, a gap of $53 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DFLV currently yields 1.41% against 0.00% for SASS.
Holdings Overlap
7.0% of DFLV's money is in holdings SASS also owns. 65.3% of SASS's money is in holdings DFLV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
15 positions in common, counted across the 335 positions we hold weights for in DFLV and 22 in SASS, against full books of 339 and 24.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 335 and 22 positions we hold weights for.
DFLV holds 260 positions SASS does not, 90.5% of the fund.
Largest: JPM 4.70%, XOM 3.69%, JNJ 2.34%, META 2.08%, CVX 1.96%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DFLV | Weight in SASS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.34% | 5.98% | 1.64% |
| AMEAmetek Inc | 0.45% | 6.01% | 5.56% |
| ADIAnalog Devices, Inc. | 0.70% | 5.43% | 4.73% |
| CLHClean Harbors Inc | 0.02% | 6.05% | 6.03% |
| COFCapital One Financial Corp. | 0.27% | 5.71% | 5.44% |
| DGXQuest Diagnostics Inc | 0.30% | 5.47% | 5.17% |
| KNXKnight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc | 0.00% | 5.68% | 5.68% |
| WMBWilliams Cos. Inc. | 0.34% | 4.61% | 4.27% |
| SGISomnigroup International Inc | 0.00% | 4.46% | 4.46% |
| SNXSynnex Corp | 0.09% | 4.13% | 4.04% |
65.3% of SASS is already inside DFLV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DFLV or SASS?
DFLV has an expense ratio of 0.22% while SASS charges 0.75%. DFLV is the cheaper option, by $53 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between DFLV and SASS?
65.3% of SASS's money is in holdings DFLV also owns. 65.3% of SASS's is in holdings DFLV also owns. They hold 15 positions in common, counted across the 335 positions we hold weights for in DFLV and 22 in SASS.
Which pays a higher dividend, DFLV or SASS?
DFLV yields 1.41% while SASS yields 0.00%, so DFLV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SASS better than DFLV?
DFLV has a lower expense ratio. DFLV is less concentrated, with 25.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.