DFNL vs WBIF
Davis Select Financial ETF vs WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF
Which is better, DFNL or WBIF?
Each has led over a different period.
DFNL has a lower expense ratio. DFNL led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, WBIF over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DFNL | WBIF |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.63%Best | 1.65% |
| AUM | $442M | $23M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.37% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 90 | 152 |
| YTD Return | -0.91% | +14.87%Best |
| 1Y Return | +8.37% | +15.37%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.68%Best | +10.35% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.68%Best | +4.01% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.8% | 12.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -44.5% | -20.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,609Best | $12,172 |
| Fund Family | Davis ETFs | WBI Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jan 11, 2017 | Aug 25, 2014 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 12, 2017 to Oct 14, 2026 (9.8 years).
DFNL vs WBIF growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 9.8 years both funds cover.
DFNL vs WBIF Performance
Davis Select Financial ETF (DFNL) is an ETF from Davis ETFs and WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF) is an ETF from WBI Investments. Over the past year DFNL returned +8.37% while WBIF returned +15.37%. Year to date, DFNL is down 0.91% versus a gain of 14.87% for WBIF.
Over three years, DFNL compounded at +22.68% per year against +10.35% for WBIF; over five years the annualized figures are +10.68% and +4.01% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, DFNL has the edge at +11.26% annualized vs +4.82%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DFNL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.8% compared with 12.4% for WBIF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -44.5% for DFNL and -20.3% for WBIF. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DFNL charges 0.63% per year while WBIF charges 1.65%. On a $10,000 position that is $63 vs $165 annually, a gap of $102 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DFNL currently yields 1.37% against 0.00% for WBIF.
Holdings Overlap
At least 10.6% of DFNL's money is in holdings WBIF also owns.
Stated as a floor: for WBIF, our book for it covers 83.6% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
DFNL and WBIF share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 30 positions we hold weights for in DFNL and 62 in WBIF, against full books of 90 and 152.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DFNL | Weight in WBIF | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| COFCapital One Financial Corp. | 10.56% | 2.12% | 8.44% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of DFNL and WBIF you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DFNL or WBIF?
DFNL has an expense ratio of 0.63% while WBIF charges 1.65%. DFNL is the cheaper option, by $102 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DFNL or WBIF?
Over the past year DFNL returned +8.37% vs +15.37% for WBIF, so WBIF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), DFNL annualized +11.26% vs +4.82% for WBIF. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DFNL or WBIF?
DFNL has been the more volatile fund at 19.8% annualized versus 12.4% for WBIF. Worst drawdown: DFNL -44.5% vs WBIF -20.3%.
Should I hold both DFNL and WBIF?
DFNL and WBIF have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between DFNL and WBIF?
At least 10.6% of DFNL's money is in holdings WBIF also owns. Our book for WBIF is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 30 positions we hold weights for in DFNL and 62 in WBIF.
Which pays a higher dividend, DFNL or WBIF?
DFNL yields 1.37% while WBIF yields 0.00%, so DFNL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is WBIF better than DFNL?
DFNL has a lower expense ratio. DFNL led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, WBIF over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.