DFUV vs IVV
Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, DFUV or IVV?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. DFUV led over 1Y, IVV over 3Y and the full window. DFUV is less concentrated, with 26.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DFUV | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.21% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $15.4B | $896.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.34% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 1,325 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +19.59%Best | +13.59% |
| 1Y Return | +27.22%Best | +17.54% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.03% | +22.46%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.28% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.1% | 15.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -17.6%Best | -18.8% |
| $10,000 over 4.4 years | $17,867 | $20,476Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 26.0%Best | 38.9% |
| Fund Family | Dimensional | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 31, 2024 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 9, 2022 to Oct 14, 2026 (4.4 years).
DFUV vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.4 years both funds cover.
DFUV vs IVV Performance
Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF (DFUV) is an ETF from Dimensional and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year DFUV returned +27.22% while IVV returned +17.54%. Year to date, DFUV is up 19.59% versus a gain of 13.59% for IVV.
Over three years, DFUV compounded at +20.03% per year against +22.46% for IVV. Across the full 4-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +17.69% annualized vs +14.10%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DFUV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.1% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.6% for DFUV and -18.8% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DFUV charges 0.21% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $21 vs $3 annually, a gap of $18 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DFUV currently yields 1.34% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
81.9% of DFUV's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 37.4% of IVV's money is in holdings DFUV also owns.
Most of DFUV is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
269 positions in common, counted across the 1,319 positions we hold weights for in DFUV and 506 in IVV, against full books of 1,325 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 232 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for DFUV (62.1% of the fund), and 580 for DFUV that do not appear in IVV (15.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DFUV | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.58% | 3.68% | 0.10% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 4.45% | 1.34% | 3.11% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 2.78% | 1.87% | 0.91% |
| XOMExxonmobil Corp. | 3.37% | 1.02% | 2.35% |
| BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc Brk/B Us Equity | 2.78% | 1.41% | 1.37% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.36% | 2.42% | 1.06% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 2.81% | 0.94% | 1.87% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 2.11% | 0.62% | 1.49% |
| INTCIntel Corporation | 1.36% | 0.90% | 0.46% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 1.37% | 0.65% | 0.72% |
81.9% of DFUV is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DFUV or IVV?
DFUV has an expense ratio of 0.21% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $18 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DFUV or IVV?
Over the past year DFUV returned +27.22% vs +17.54% for IVV, so DFUV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), DFUV annualized +14.10% vs +17.69% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DFUV or IVV?
DFUV has been the more volatile fund at 16.1% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: DFUV -17.6% vs IVV -18.8%.
Should I hold both DFUV and IVV?
DFUV and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between DFUV and IVV?
81.9% of DFUV's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 37.4% of IVV's is in holdings DFUV also owns. They hold 269 positions in common, counted across the 1,319 positions we hold weights for in DFUV and 506 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, DFUV or IVV?
DFUV yields 1.34% while IVV yields 1.10%, so DFUV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than DFUV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. DFUV led over 1Y, IVV over 3Y and the full window. DFUV is less concentrated, with 26.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.