DFVX vs JMOM
Dimensional US Large Cap Vector ETF vs JPMorgan US Momentum Factor ETF
Which is better, DFVX or JMOM?
JMOM has been ahead.
JMOM has a lower expense ratio. JMOM led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. JMOM is less concentrated, with 19.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 32.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DFVX | JMOM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.19% | 0.12%Best |
| AUM | $537M | $2.8B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.12% | 0.74% |
| Holdings | 325 | 594 |
| YTD Return | +15.41% | +22.65%Best |
| 1Y Return | +20.11% | +25.46%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.43% | +27.32%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.60% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.3%Best | 14.2% |
| Max Drawdown | -16.7%Best | -19.5% |
| $10,000 over 2.9 years | $17,145 | $20,735Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 32.0% | 19.2%Best |
| Fund Family | Dimensional | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 2, 2023 | Nov 8, 2017 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 2, 2023 to Oct 13, 2026 (2.9 years).
DFVX vs JMOM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.9 years both funds cover.
DFVX vs JMOM Performance
Dimensional US Large Cap Vector ETF (DFVX) is an ETF from Dimensional and JPMorgan US Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM) is an ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management. Over the past year DFVX returned +20.11% while JMOM returned +25.46%. Year to date, DFVX is up 15.41% versus a gain of 22.65% for JMOM.
Over three years, DFVX compounded at +20.43% per year against +27.32% for JMOM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
JMOM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.2% compared with 11.3% for DFVX. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.7% for DFVX and -19.5% for JMOM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DFVX charges 0.19% per year while JMOM charges 0.12%. On a $10,000 position that is $19 vs $12 annually, a gap of $7 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DFVX currently yields 1.12% against 0.74% for JMOM.
Holdings Overlap
54.9% of DFVX's money is in holdings JMOM also owns. 55.0% of JMOM's money is in holdings DFVX also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
108 positions in common, counted across the 323 positions we hold weights for in DFVX and 288 in JMOM, against full books of 325 and 594.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 167 positions for JMOM that do not appear in our book for DFVX (41.4% of the fund), and 194 for DFVX that do not appear in JMOM (43.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DFVX | Weight in JMOM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.03% | 2.13% | 3.90% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 4.65% | 1.85% | 2.80% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 5.11% | 0.58% | 4.53% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 2.88% | 1.98% | 0.90% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 2.48% | 1.92% | 0.56% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 2.18% | 1.95% | 0.23% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 1.03% | 2.09% | 1.06% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 2.26% | 0.60% | 1.66% |
| WMTWalmart, Inc. | 1.10% | 1.23% | 0.13% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 0.04% | 2.19% | 2.15% |
55.0% of JMOM is already inside DFVX.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DFVX or JMOM?
DFVX has an expense ratio of 0.19% while JMOM charges 0.12%. JMOM is the cheaper option, by $7 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DFVX or JMOM?
Over the past year DFVX returned +20.11% vs +25.46% for JMOM, so JMOM leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DFVX or JMOM?
JMOM has been the more volatile fund at 14.2% annualized versus 11.3% for DFVX. Worst drawdown: DFVX -16.7% vs JMOM -19.5%.
Should I hold both DFVX and JMOM?
DFVX and JMOM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between DFVX and JMOM?
55.0% of JMOM's money is in holdings DFVX also owns. 55.0% of JMOM's is in holdings DFVX also owns. They hold 108 positions in common, counted across the 323 positions we hold weights for in DFVX and 288 in JMOM.
Which pays a higher dividend, DFVX or JMOM?
DFVX yields 1.12% while JMOM yields 0.74%, so DFVX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is JMOM better than DFVX?
JMOM has a lower expense ratio. JMOM led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. JMOM is less concentrated, with 19.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 32.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.