DGRE vs RWEM
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund vs Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor Emerging Markets Equity ETF
Which is better, DGRE or RWEM?
DGRE has been ahead.
DGRE has a lower expense ratio. DGRE led over 1Y. RWEM is less concentrated, with 35.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DGRE | RWEM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.32%Best | 0.52% |
| AUM | $145M | $71M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.39% | 1.77% |
| Holdings | 282 | 450 |
| YTD Return | +22.92%Best | +15.92% |
| 1Y Return | +35.75% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.70% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.25% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 42.2% | 35.9%Best |
| Fund Family | WisdomTree Investments | The Advisors Inner Circle Fund |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 1, 2013 | Dec 15, 2021 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
DGRE vs RWEM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
DGRE vs RWEM Performance
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRE) is an ETF from WisdomTree Investments and Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (RWEM) is an ETF from The Advisors Inner Circle Fund. Year to date, DGRE is up 22.92% versus a gain of 15.92% for RWEM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DGRE charges 0.32% per year while RWEM charges 0.52%. On a $10,000 position that is $32 vs $52 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DGRE currently yields 1.39% against 1.77% for RWEM.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 198 holdings in DGRE and 223 in RWEM, totalling 99.8% and 98.6% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 198 positions we hold weights for in DGRE and 223 in RWEM, against full books of 282 and 450.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 3 positions for RWEM that do not appear in our book for DGRE (0.6% of the fund), and 198 for DGRE that do not appear in RWEM (99.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of DGRE and RWEM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DGRE or RWEM?
DGRE has an expense ratio of 0.32% while RWEM charges 0.52%. DGRE is the cheaper option, by $20 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, DGRE or RWEM?
DGRE yields 1.39% while RWEM yields 1.77%, so RWEM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RWEM better than DGRE?
DGRE has a lower expense ratio. DGRE led over 1Y. RWEM is less concentrated, with 35.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.