DGRW vs IVV
WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth Fund vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, DGRW or IVV?
Nearly the same fund. IVV costs less.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DGRW | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.28% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $17.2B | $896.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.22% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 398 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +11.23% | +13.59%Best |
| 1Y Return | +13.25% | +17.54%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.01% | +22.46%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.17% | +13.28%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.4%Best | 14.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -32.2%Best | -33.9% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $17,758 | $18,654Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 42.2% | 38.9%Best |
| Fund Family | WisdomTree Investments | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 22, 2013 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 22, 2013 to Oct 14, 2026 (13.4 years).
DGRW vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 13.4 years both funds cover.
DGRW vs IVV Performance
WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) is an ETF from WisdomTree Investments and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year DGRW returned +13.25% while IVV returned +17.54%. Year to date, DGRW is up 11.23% versus a gain of 13.59% for IVV.
Over three years, DGRW compounded at +17.01% per year against +22.46% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +12.17% and +13.28% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +12.80% annualized vs +11.68%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.4% compared with 13.4% for DGRW. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -32.2% for DGRW and -33.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DGRW charges 0.28% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $28 vs $3 annually, a gap of $25 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DGRW currently yields 1.22% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
95.2% of DGRW's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 57.5% of IVV's money is in holdings DGRW also owns.
Most of DGRW is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
137 positions in common, counted across the 198 positions we hold weights for in DGRW and 506 in IVV, against full books of 398 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 363 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for DGRW (42.0% of the fund), and 61 for DGRW that do not appear in IVV (4.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DGRW | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 8.02% | 5.76% | 2.26% |
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 5.00% | 8.44% | 3.44% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 5.96% | 7.29% | 1.33% |
| XOMExxonmobil Corp. | 5.08% | 1.02% | 4.06% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.34% | 2.47% | 0.87% |
| GOOGLAlphabet, Inc. - Class a | 1.78% | 3.00% | 1.22% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 3.70% | 0.69% | 3.01% |
| METAMeta Platforms, Inc. | 1.79% | 2.42% | 0.63% |
| GOOGAlphabate, Inc Class C | 1.65% | 2.41% | 0.76% |
| KOCoca Cola Co. | 3.12% | 0.50% | 2.62% |
95.2% of DGRW is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DGRW or IVV?
DGRW has an expense ratio of 0.28% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $25 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DGRW or IVV?
Over the past year DGRW returned +13.25% vs +17.54% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), DGRW annualized +11.68% vs +12.80% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DGRW or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 14.4% annualized versus 13.4% for DGRW. Worst drawdown: DGRW -32.2% vs IVV -33.9%.
Should I hold both DGRW and IVV?
DGRW and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between DGRW and IVV?
95.2% of DGRW's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 57.5% of IVV's is in holdings DGRW also owns. They hold 137 positions in common, counted across the 198 positions we hold weights for in DGRW and 506 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, DGRW or IVV?
DGRW yields 1.22% while IVV yields 1.10%, so DGRW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than DGRW?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.