DIHP vs FEDM
Dimensional International High Profitability ETF vs Northern Trust ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core ETF
Which is better, DIHP or FEDM?
Nearly the same fund. FEDM costs less.
FEDM has a lower expense ratio. FEDM led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.99.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DIHP | FEDM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.28% | 0.12%Best |
| AUM | $6.5B | $82M |
| Dividend Yield | 2.05% | 2.89% |
| Holdings | 521 | 265 |
| YTD Return | +5.92% | +8.67%Best |
| 1Y Return | +11.56% | +14.21%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.15% | +17.03%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +7.65% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.2% | 15.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -24.9% | -24.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.6 years | $14,696 | $15,290Best |
| Fund Family | Dimensional | Northern Trust Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 23, 2022 | Sep 20, 2021 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 24, 2022 to Oct 14, 2026 (4.6 years).
DIHP vs FEDM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.6 years both funds cover.
DIHP vs FEDM Performance
Dimensional International High Profitability ETF (DIHP) is an ETF from Dimensional and Northern Trust ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core ETF (FEDM) is an ETF from Northern Trust Asset Management. Over the past year DIHP returned +11.56% while FEDM returned +14.21%. Year to date, DIHP is up 5.92% versus a gain of 8.67% for FEDM.
Over three years, DIHP compounded at +15.15% per year against +17.03% for FEDM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DIHP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.2% compared with 15.8% for FEDM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.9% for DIHP and -24.6% for FEDM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.99. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DIHP charges 0.28% per year while FEDM charges 0.12%. On a $10,000 position that is $28 vs $12 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DIHP currently yields 2.05% against 2.89% for FEDM.
Holdings Overlap
At least 42.3% of FEDM's money is in holdings DIHP also owns.
Stated as a floor: for DIHP, our book for it covers 94.1% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
81 positions in common, counted across the 476 positions we hold weights for in DIHP and 214 in FEDM, against full books of 521 and 265.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DIHP | Weight in FEDM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASML:ASASML HOLDING NV | 0.30% | 2.82% | 2.52% |
| NESN:SMNestle Sa | 1.82% | 1.03% | 0.79% |
| 6098:TKRecruit Holdings Co Ltd | 1.30% | 1.18% | 0.12% |
| AZN:LNAstraZeneca PLC | 1.24% | 1.24% | 0.00% |
| SCHN:PASchneider Electric Se | 1.11% | 1.34% | 0.23% |
| BBVA:MABanco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria S.A. Reg Shs | 0.64% | 1.40% | 0.76% |
| 8035:JPTokyo Electron Ltd. Com Stk | 1.64% | 0.39% | 1.25% |
| RY:CARoyal Bank of Canada | 0.04% | 1.85% | 1.81% |
| SHEL:LNShell plc | 0.17% | 1.59% | 1.42% |
| NOVN:SMNovartis Ag – Class N | 0.28% | 1.41% | 1.13% |
42.3% of FEDM is already inside DIHP.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DIHP or FEDM?
DIHP has an expense ratio of 0.28% while FEDM charges 0.12%. FEDM is the cheaper option, by $16 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DIHP or FEDM?
Over the past year DIHP returned +11.56% vs +14.21% for FEDM, so FEDM leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DIHP or FEDM?
DIHP has been the more volatile fund at 16.2% annualized versus 15.8% for FEDM. Worst drawdown: DIHP -24.9% vs FEDM -24.6%.
Should I hold both DIHP and FEDM?
DIHP and FEDM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.99, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between DIHP and FEDM?
At least 42.3% of FEDM's money is in holdings DIHP also owns. Our book for DIHP is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 81 positions in common, counted across the 476 positions we hold weights for in DIHP and 214 in FEDM.
Which pays a higher dividend, DIHP or FEDM?
DIHP yields 2.05% while FEDM yields 2.89%, so FEDM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is FEDM better than DIHP?
FEDM has a lower expense ratio. FEDM led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.99. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.