DIHP vs RINT
Dimensional International High Profitability ETF vs Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF
Which is better, DIHP or RINT?
Nearly the same fund. DIHP costs less.
DIHP has a lower expense ratio. RINT led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DIHP | RINT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.28%Best | 0.49% |
| AUM | $6.5B | $156M |
| Dividend Yield | 2.05% | 0.81% |
| Holdings | 521 | 364 |
| YTD Return | +5.92% | +7.35%Best |
| 1Y Return | +11.56% | +14.43%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.15% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.1%Best | 12.2% |
| Max Drawdown | -10.9%Best | -11.9% |
| $10,000 over 1.4 years | $12,200 | $12,593Best |
| Fund Family | Dimensional | Russell Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 23, 2022 | May 13, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 14, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.4 years).
DIHP vs RINT growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.4 years both funds cover.
DIHP vs RINT Performance
Dimensional International High Profitability ETF (DIHP) is an ETF from Dimensional and Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF (RINT) is an ETF from Russell Investments. Over the past year DIHP returned +11.56% while RINT returned +14.43%. Year to date, DIHP is up 5.92% versus a gain of 7.35% for RINT.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RINT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.2% compared with 12.1% for DIHP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.9% for DIHP and -11.9% for RINT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DIHP charges 0.28% per year while RINT charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $28 vs $49 annually, a gap of $21 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DIHP currently yields 2.05% against 0.81% for RINT.
Holdings Overlap
At least 27.1% of RINT's money is in holdings DIHP also owns.
Stated as a floor: for DIHP, our book for it covers 94.1% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
RINT and DIHP share little of their money.
74 positions in common, counted across the 476 positions we hold weights for in DIHP and 328 in RINT, against full books of 521 and 364.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DIHP | Weight in RINT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASML:ASASML HOLDING NV | 0.30% | 2.39% | 2.09% |
| NESN:SMNestle Sa | 1.82% | 0.59% | 1.23% |
| 8035:JPTokyo Electron Ltd. Com Stk | 1.64% | 0.69% | 0.95% |
| 6857:TKAdvantest Corp | 1.54% | 0.65% | 0.89% |
| AZN:LNAstrazeneca Plc | 1.24% | 0.73% | 0.51% |
| 6501:JPHitachi Ltd | 1.04% | 0.62% | 0.42% |
| LVMH:PALVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE | 1.15% | 0.49% | 0.66% |
| NOVO.B:CONovo Nordisk A/S B Common Stock Dkk.1 | 0.96% | 0.51% | 0.45% |
| SHEL:LNShell Plc Ord GBP0.07 | 0.17% | 1.18% | 1.01% |
| CNQ:CACanadian Natural Resources Ltd | 0.85% | 0.48% | 0.37% |
27.1% of RINT is already inside DIHP.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DIHP or RINT?
DIHP has an expense ratio of 0.28% while RINT charges 0.49%. DIHP is the cheaper option, by $21 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DIHP or RINT?
Over the past year DIHP returned +11.56% vs +14.43% for RINT, so RINT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), DIHP annualized +15.26% vs +17.90% for RINT. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DIHP or RINT?
RINT has been the more volatile fund at 12.2% annualized versus 12.1% for DIHP. Worst drawdown: DIHP -10.9% vs RINT -11.9%.
Should I hold both DIHP and RINT?
DIHP and RINT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between DIHP and RINT?
At least 27.1% of RINT's money is in holdings DIHP also owns. Our book for DIHP is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 74 positions in common, counted across the 476 positions we hold weights for in DIHP and 328 in RINT.
Which pays a higher dividend, DIHP or RINT?
DIHP yields 2.05% while RINT yields 0.81%, so DIHP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RINT better than DIHP?
DIHP has a lower expense ratio. RINT led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.