DINT vs MOO
Davis Select International ETF vs VanEck Agribusiness ETF
Which is better, DINT or MOO?
Each has led over a different period.
MOO has a lower expense ratio. DINT led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, MOO over 1Y. DINT is less concentrated, with 52.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 56.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DINT | MOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.66% | 0.56%Best |
| AUM | $269M | $1.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.69% | 2.20% |
| Holdings | 84 | 51 |
| YTD Return | -4.02% | +11.54%Best |
| 1Y Return | +2.16% | +16.95%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.73%Best | +4.13% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.02%Best | -0.90% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.9% | 18.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -45.1% | -41.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,707Best | $9,558 |
| Top 10 Weight | 52.0%Best | 56.9% |
| Fund Family | Davis ETFs | VanEck |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 1, 2018 | Aug 31, 2007 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 2, 2018 to Oct 14, 2026 (8.6 years).
DINT vs MOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8.6 years both funds cover.
DINT vs MOO Performance
Davis Select International ETF (DINT) is an ETF from Davis ETFs and VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) is an ETF from VanEck. Over the past year DINT returned +2.16% while MOO returned +16.95%. Year to date, DINT is down 4.02% versus a gain of 11.54% for MOO.
Over three years, DINT compounded at +17.73% per year against +4.13% for MOO; over five years the annualized figures are +8.02% and -0.90% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, DINT has the edge at +5.51% annualized vs +4.91%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DINT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.9% compared with 18.3% for MOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -45.1% for DINT and -41.5% for MOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DINT charges 0.66% per year while MOO charges 0.56%. On a $10,000 position that is $66 vs $56 annually, a gap of $10 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DINT currently yields 1.69% against 2.20% for MOO.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 28 holdings in DINT and 47 in MOO, totalling 100.0% and 99.3% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 28 positions we hold weights for in DINT and 47 in MOO, against full books of 84 and 51.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 18 positions for MOO that do not appear in our book for DINT (54.2% of the fund), and 3 for DINT that do not appear in MOO (4.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of DINT and MOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DINT or MOO?
DINT has an expense ratio of 0.66% while MOO charges 0.56%. MOO is the cheaper option, by $10 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DINT or MOO?
Over the past year DINT returned +2.16% vs +16.95% for MOO, so MOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), DINT annualized +5.51% vs +4.91% for MOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DINT or MOO?
DINT has been the more volatile fund at 19.9% annualized versus 18.3% for MOO. Worst drawdown: DINT -45.1% vs MOO -41.5%.
Should I hold both DINT and MOO?
DINT and MOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, DINT or MOO?
DINT yields 1.69% while MOO yields 2.20%, so MOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is MOO better than DINT?
MOO has a lower expense ratio. DINT led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, MOO over 1Y. DINT is less concentrated, with 52.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 56.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.