DISO vs GDXY
YieldMax DIS Option Income Strategy ETF vs YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF
Which is better, DISO or GDXY?
GDXY has been ahead.
GDXY has a lower expense ratio. GDXY led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DISO | GDXY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.32% | 1.00%Best |
| AUM | $4M | $306M |
| Dividend Yield | 43.83% | 81.80% |
| Holdings | 30 | 28 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.4%Best | 28.7% |
| Max Drawdown | -26.5%Best | -34.2% |
| $10,000 over 2.1 years | $10,000 | $15,356Best |
| Fund Family | YieldMax ETF | YieldMax ETF |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Aug 24, 2023 | May 20, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 121 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. DISO has data through Jun 15, 2026 and GDXY through Oct 14, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 21, 2024 to Jun 15, 2026 (2.1 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GDXY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 28.7% compared with 23.4% for DISO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -26.5% for DISO and -34.2% for GDXY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.16. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DISO charges 1.32% per year while GDXY charges 1.00%. On a $10,000 position that is $132 vs $100 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DISO currently yields 43.83% against 81.80% for GDXY.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 6 holdings in DISO and 2 in GDXY, totalling 92.6% and 21.8% of the two funds. Neither is a share of a fund we can divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 1 positions appear in both.
The two holdings books were reported 227 days apart, DISO as of Jan 31, 2026 and GDXY as of Sep 15, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
1 positions in common, counted across the 6 positions we hold weights for in DISO and 2 in GDXY, against full books of 30 and 28.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DISO | Weight in GDXY | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FGXXXFirst American Government Obligations Fund | 3.05% | 2.17% | 0.88% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of DISO and GDXY you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DISO or GDXY?
DISO has an expense ratio of 1.32% while GDXY charges 1.00%. GDXY is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, DISO or GDXY?
GDXY has been the more volatile fund at 28.7% annualized versus 23.4% for DISO. Worst drawdown: DISO -26.5% vs GDXY -34.2%.
Should I hold both DISO and GDXY?
DISO and GDXY have a monthly-return correlation of -0.16, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, DISO or GDXY?
DISO yields 43.83% while GDXY yields 81.80%, so GDXY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is GDXY better than DISO?
GDXY has a lower expense ratio. GDXY led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.