DISO vs MRNY
YieldMax DIS Option Income Strategy ETF vs YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF
Which is better, DISO or MRNY?
Each has led over a different period.
MRNY has a lower expense ratio. DISO led over the full window, MRNY over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DISO | MRNY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.32% | 1.00%Best |
| AUM | $4M | $243M |
| Dividend Yield | 43.83% | 41.90% |
| Holdings | 30 | 31 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.8%Best | 46.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -26.6%Best | -82.2% |
| $10,000 over 2.6 years | $11,196Best | $4,953 |
| Fund Family | YieldMax ETF | YieldMax ETF |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Aug 24, 2023 | Oct 23, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 121 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. DISO has data through Jun 15, 2026 and MRNY through Oct 14, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 24, 2023 to Jun 15, 2026 (2.6 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MRNY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 46.4% compared with 22.8% for DISO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -26.6% for DISO and -82.2% for MRNY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.12. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DISO charges 1.32% per year while MRNY charges 1.00%. On a $10,000 position that is $132 vs $100 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DISO currently yields 43.83% against 41.90% for MRNY.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 6 holdings in DISO and 2 in MRNY, totalling 92.6% and 12.8% of the two funds. Neither is a share of a fund we can divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 1 positions appear in both.
The two holdings books were reported 227 days apart, DISO as of Jan 31, 2026 and MRNY as of Sep 15, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
1 positions in common, counted across the 6 positions we hold weights for in DISO and 2 in MRNY, against full books of 30 and 31.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DISO | Weight in MRNY | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FGXXXFirst American Government Obligations Fund | 3.05% | 7.27% | 4.22% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of DISO and MRNY you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DISO or MRNY?
DISO has an expense ratio of 1.32% while MRNY charges 1.00%. MRNY is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, DISO or MRNY?
MRNY has been the more volatile fund at 46.4% annualized versus 22.8% for DISO. Worst drawdown: DISO -26.6% vs MRNY -82.2%.
Should I hold both DISO and MRNY?
DISO and MRNY have a monthly-return correlation of -0.12, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, DISO or MRNY?
DISO yields 43.83% while MRNY yields 41.90%, so DISO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is MRNY better than DISO?
MRNY has a lower expense ratio. DISO led over the full window, MRNY over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.