DISO vs RSST
YieldMax DIS Option Income Strategy ETF vs Return Stacked US Stocks & Managed Futures ETF
Which is better, DISO or RSST?
RSST has been ahead.
RSST has a lower expense ratio. RSST led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DISO | RSST |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.32% | 0.99%Best |
| AUM | $4M | $602M |
| Dividend Yield | 43.83% | 0.23% |
| Holdings | 30 | 36 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.5% | 17.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -26.6%Best | -30.8% |
| $10,000 over 2.8 years | $11,685 | $16,619Best |
| Fund Family | YieldMax ETF | Return Stacked ETF |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Aug 24, 2023 | Sep 6, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 121 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. DISO has data through Jun 15, 2026 and RSST through Oct 14, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 6, 2023 to Jun 15, 2026 (2.8 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DISO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.5% compared with 17.9% for RSST. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -26.6% for DISO and -30.8% for RSST. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.53. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DISO charges 1.32% per year while RSST charges 0.99%. On a $10,000 position that is $132 vs $99 annually, a gap of $33 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DISO currently yields 43.83% against 0.23% for RSST.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 6 holdings in DISO and 2 in RSST, totalling 92.6% and 88.8% of the two funds. Neither is a share of a fund we can divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 1 positions appear in both.
The two holdings books were reported 250 days apart, DISO as of Jan 31, 2026 and RSST as of Oct 8, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
1 positions in common, counted across the 6 positions we hold weights for in DISO and 2 in RSST, against full books of 30 and 36.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DISO | Weight in RSST | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FGXXXFirst American Government Obligations Fund | 3.05% | 14.34% | 11.29% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of DISO and RSST you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DISO or RSST?
DISO has an expense ratio of 1.32% while RSST charges 0.99%. RSST is the cheaper option, by $33 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, DISO or RSST?
DISO has been the more volatile fund at 22.5% annualized versus 17.9% for RSST. Worst drawdown: DISO -26.6% vs RSST -30.8%.
Should I hold both DISO and RSST?
DISO and RSST have a monthly-return correlation of 0.53, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, DISO or RSST?
DISO yields 43.83% while RSST yields 0.23%, so DISO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RSST better than DISO?
RSST has a lower expense ratio. RSST led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.