DISO vs WGMI
YieldMax DIS Option Income Strategy ETF vs CoinShares Bitcoin Mining and Digital Power ETF
Which is better, DISO or WGMI?
WGMI has been ahead.
WGMI has a lower expense ratio. WGMI led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DISO | WGMI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.32% | 0.75%Best |
| AUM | $4M | $194M |
| Dividend Yield | 43.83% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 30 | 57 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.2%Best | 83.8% |
| Max Drawdown | -26.6%Best | -62.8% |
| $10,000 over 2.8 years | $11,381 | $64,219Best |
| Fund Family | YieldMax ETF | Valkyrie Funds |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Aug 24, 2023 | Feb 7, 2022 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 122 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. DISO has data through Jun 15, 2026 and WGMI through Oct 15, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 25, 2023 to Jun 15, 2026 (2.8 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
WGMI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 83.8% compared with 22.2% for DISO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -26.6% for DISO and -62.8% for WGMI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.37. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DISO charges 1.32% per year while WGMI charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $132 vs $75 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DISO currently yields 43.83% against 0.00% for WGMI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 6 holdings in DISO and 28 in WGMI, totalling 92.6% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 244 days apart, DISO as of Jan 31, 2026 and WGMI as of Oct 2, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 6 positions we hold weights for in DISO and 28 in WGMI, against full books of 30 and 57.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of DISO and WGMI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DISO or WGMI?
DISO has an expense ratio of 1.32% while WGMI charges 0.75%. WGMI is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, DISO or WGMI?
WGMI has been the more volatile fund at 83.8% annualized versus 22.2% for DISO. Worst drawdown: DISO -26.6% vs WGMI -62.8%.
Should I hold both DISO and WGMI?
DISO and WGMI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.37, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, DISO or WGMI?
DISO yields 43.83% while WGMI yields 0.00%, so DISO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is WGMI better than DISO?
WGMI has a lower expense ratio. WGMI led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.