DISO vs ZALT
YieldMax DIS Option Income Strategy ETF vs Innovator US Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly
Which is better, DISO or ZALT?
ZALT has been ahead.
ZALT has a lower expense ratio. ZALT led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DISO | ZALT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.32% | 0.69%Best |
| AUM | $4M | $794M |
| Dividend Yield | 43.83% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 30 | 18 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.8% | 4.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -26.6% | -8.2%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.7 years | $11,520 | $13,219Best |
| Fund Family | YieldMax ETF | Innovator ETFs Trust |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Aug 24, 2023 | Oct 2, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 121 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. DISO has data through Jun 15, 2026 and ZALT through Oct 14, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 2, 2023 to Jun 15, 2026 (2.7 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DISO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.8% compared with 4.0% for ZALT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -26.6% for DISO and -8.2% for ZALT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.65. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DISO charges 1.32% per year while ZALT charges 0.69%. On a $10,000 position that is $132 vs $69 annually, a gap of $63 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DISO currently yields 43.83% against 0.00% for ZALT.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of DISO and ZALT you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DISO or ZALT?
DISO has an expense ratio of 1.32% while ZALT charges 0.69%. ZALT is the cheaper option, by $63 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, DISO or ZALT?
DISO has been the more volatile fund at 22.8% annualized versus 4.0% for ZALT. Worst drawdown: DISO -26.6% vs ZALT -8.2%.
Should I hold both DISO and ZALT?
DISO and ZALT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.65, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, DISO or ZALT?
DISO yields 43.83% while ZALT yields 0.00%, so DISO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is ZALT better than DISO?
ZALT has a lower expense ratio. ZALT led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.