DIVH vs QQQ

DIVH vs QQQ

Which is better, DIVH or QQQ?

Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. DIVH is less concentrated, with 32.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.7%.

Lower Fees: QQQLess Concentrated: DIVH

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricDIVHQQQ
Expense Ratio0.67%0.18%Best
AUM$4M$506.1B
Dividend Yield0.12%0.42%
Holdings60321
YTD Return-2.39%+19.30%Best
1Y Return-+22.47%
3Y Return (annualized)-+26.18%
5Y Return (annualized)-+15.42%
Top 10 Weight32.7%Best46.7%
Fund FamilyIntegrity Viking FundsInvesco (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Growth
InceptionSep 1, 2026Mar 10, 1999

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

DIVH vs QQQ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

DIVH vs QQQ Performance

Integrity Dividend Harvest ETF (DIVH) is an ETF from Integrity Viking Funds and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, DIVH is down 2.39% versus a gain of 19.30% for QQQ.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

DIVH charges 0.67% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $67 vs $18 annually, a gap of $49 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DIVH currently yields 0.12% against 0.42% for QQQ.

Holdings Overlap

DIVH already in QQQ14.8%
QQQ already in DIVH6.8%

14.8% of DIVH's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 6.8% of QQQ's money is in holdings DIVH also owns.

DIVH and QQQ share little of their money.

9 positions in common, counted across the 60 positions we hold weights for in DIVH and 101 in QQQ, against full books of 60 and 321.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 84 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for DIVH (89.5% of the fund), and 47 for DIVH that do not appear in QQQ (77.9%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in DIVHWeight in QQQDifference
AVGOBroadcom Inc4.63%2.53%2.10%
PEPPepsico Inc.2.56%0.72%1.84%
TXNTexas Instrument Inc1.28%1.07%0.21%
XELXcel Energy Inc.2.12%0.18%1.94%
QCOMQualcomm Inc.1.12%0.81%0.31%
TMUST-Mobile Usa Inc Esrw Usd Npv Ref Sm#5855580.61%0.73%0.12%
MCHPMicrochip Technology Inc.1.11%0.18%0.93%
SBUXStarbucks Corp0.63%0.45%0.18%
PAYXPaychex, Inc.0.74%0.15%0.59%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of DIVH and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

DIVHQQQ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, DIVH or QQQ?

DIVH has an expense ratio of 0.67% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $49 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between DIVH and QQQ?

14.8% of DIVH's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 6.8% of QQQ's is in holdings DIVH also owns. They hold 9 positions in common, counted across the 60 positions we hold weights for in DIVH and 101 in QQQ.

Which pays a higher dividend, DIVH or QQQ?

DIVH yields 0.12% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is QQQ better than DIVH?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. DIVH is less concentrated, with 32.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.