DIVL vs TALV
Madison Dividend Value ETF vs Transamerica Large Value Active ETF
Which is better, DIVL or TALV?
TALV costs less.
TALV has a lower expense ratio. TALV is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DIVL | TALV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.49%Best |
| AUM | $61M | $178M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.83% | 0.73% |
| Holdings | 40 | 70 |
| YTD Return | +10.65% | +14.25%Best |
| 1Y Return | +12.67% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.06% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.2% | 33.5%Best |
| Fund Family | Madison Funds | Transamerica |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Aug 14, 2023 | Dec 15, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
DIVL vs TALV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
DIVL vs TALV Performance
Madison Dividend Value ETF (DIVL) is an ETF from Madison Funds and Transamerica Large Value Active ETF (TALV) is an ETF from Transamerica. Year to date, DIVL is up 10.65% versus a gain of 14.25% for TALV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DIVL charges 0.65% per year while TALV charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $49 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DIVL currently yields 1.83% against 0.73% for TALV.
Holdings Overlap
48.7% of DIVL's money is in holdings TALV also owns. 28.4% of TALV's money is in holdings DIVL also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
18 positions in common, counted across the 37 positions we hold weights for in DIVL and 68 in TALV, against full books of 40 and 70.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 37 and 68 positions we hold weights for.
DIVL holds 18 positions TALV does not, 49.9% of the fund.
Largest: JNJ 5.57%, CVX 5.27%, CME 3.76%, ADI 3.51%, UNP 3.49%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DIVL | Weight in TALV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XOMExxonmobil Corp. | 5.26% | 2.97% | 2.29% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 2.77% | 4.00% | 1.23% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 3.80% | 2.35% | 1.45% |
| COPConocophillips Common Stock USD 0.01 | 3.56% | 1.38% | 2.18% |
| NEENextera Energy Inc | 3.58% | 1.28% | 2.30% |
| KOCoca Cola Co. | 3.00% | 1.81% | 1.19% |
| BACBank of America Corp.: Financials | 2.64% | 1.88% | 0.76% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Company | 3.38% | 0.89% | 2.49% |
| APDAir Products & Chemicals Inc. | 2.82% | 1.41% | 1.41% |
| AMGNAmgen Inc. | 2.82% | 1.04% | 1.78% |
48.7% of DIVL is already inside TALV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DIVL or TALV?
DIVL has an expense ratio of 0.65% while TALV charges 0.49%. TALV is the cheaper option, by $16 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between DIVL and TALV?
48.7% of DIVL's money is in holdings TALV also owns. 28.4% of TALV's is in holdings DIVL also owns. They hold 18 positions in common, counted across the 37 positions we hold weights for in DIVL and 68 in TALV.
Which pays a higher dividend, DIVL or TALV?
DIVL yields 1.83% while TALV yields 0.73%, so DIVL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TALV better than DIVL?
TALV has a lower expense ratio. TALV is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.