DIVP vs RJCA
Cullen Enhanced Equity Income ETF vs RJ ClariVest Capital Appreciation ETF
Which is better, DIVP or RJCA?
RJCA has been ahead.
DIVP has a lower expense ratio. RJCA led over 1Y. DIVP is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DIVP | RJCA |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55%Best | 0.61% |
| AUM | $61M | $617M |
| Dividend Yield | 6.81% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 47 | 72 |
| YTD Return | +9.06%Best | +4.02% |
| 1Y Return | +14.04% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 36.4%Best | 57.0% |
| Fund Family | Cullen Funds | Carillon Family of Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Mar 6, 2024 | Mar 21, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
DIVP vs RJCA growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
DIVP vs RJCA Performance
Cullen Enhanced Equity Income ETF (DIVP) is an ETF from Cullen Funds and RJ ClariVest Capital Appreciation ETF (RJCA) is an ETF from Carillon Family of Funds. Year to date, DIVP is up 9.06% versus a gain of 4.02% for RJCA.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DIVP charges 0.55% per year while RJCA charges 0.61%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $61 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DIVP currently yields 6.81% against 0.00% for RJCA.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 35 holdings in DIVP and 71 in RJCA, totalling 99.6% and 99.4% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 35 positions we hold weights for in DIVP and 71 in RJCA, against full books of 47 and 72.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 70 positions for RJCA that do not appear in our book for DIVP (99.0% of the fund), and 33 for DIVP that do not appear in RJCA (94.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of DIVP and RJCA you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DIVP or RJCA?
DIVP has an expense ratio of 0.55% while RJCA charges 0.61%. DIVP is the cheaper option, by $6 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, DIVP or RJCA?
DIVP yields 6.81% while RJCA yields 0.00%, so DIVP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RJCA better than DIVP?
DIVP has a lower expense ratio. RJCA led over 1Y. DIVP is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.